If getting grandfathered in is a key factor for you and you will be paying retail I have a feeling you will want the TB, if for nothing else than getting locked in early on the data pricing.
To be clear -- any thoughts about 'grandfathering' is just a bet you are making that whatever plan you choose today will be available for the Thunderbolt.If getting grandfathered in is a key factor for you and you will be paying retail I have a feeling you will want the TB, if for nothing else than getting locked in early on the data pricing.
To be clear -- any thoughts about 'grandfathering' is just a bet you are making that whatever plan you choose today will be available for the Thunderbolt.If getting grandfathered in is a key factor for you and you will be paying retail I have a feeling you will want the TB, if for nothing else than getting locked in early on the data pricing.
IMO, if you want 4g, that's a bad bet.
It's not an uncommon practice with other carriers to require a 'SPECIFIC' type of plan with 'SPECIFIC' phones. This is how Sprint migrated a lot of people on the old $15/mo Unlimited data plans to the Everything Data plans.
All VZW has to do is say, if you want the TB with 4g -- you need the 4g Data Plan (which hasn't been released yet) -- and suddenly, any plans you have to 'grandfather' in at the current price are quickly made irrelevant.
We also don't know if the TB will still require a 4g plan even in markets without 3g. So again, you are taking a leap of faith in 'locking' into anything.
Where I think the 'grandfather' thing has credibility is if you have an existing phone under an existing unlimited plan under contract for 2 years. I've reviewed all the T&Cs and I don't see anything that says they can change it on you.
So, presumably, if they changed your terms this summer to a Tiering, you wouldn't be impacted until you needed to upgrade your phone or plan. And if they do make the change on you, I read that as you having cause to cancel your contract.
Data isn't part of the contract; it's an an add-on feature. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to drop it whenever you wanted.
Data isn't part of the contract; it's an an add-on feature. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to drop it whenever you wanted.
Data isn't part of the contract; it's an an add-on feature. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to drop it whenever you wanted.
I can't speak for Big Red -- my point here is that other carriers require specific data packages for specific phones. Can't drop it -- it's required.
Sprint, for example, came right out and said that if you had an 'unlimited data' plan for one of their non-smartphones (called feature phones), you couldn't use that data plan on a smartphone. If you wanted to 'upgrade' and keep your existing plan, your choices of phones was limited to these 'feature' phones.
My expectation is that when the TB releases, that VZW will do something similar. Basically, if you want the phone -- you need the right data package.
Data isn't part of the contract; it's an an add-on feature. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to drop it whenever you wanted.
That's a pretty critical insight. They can do what they want, but kind of a bad customer practice not to grandfather people that already have the feature.
But ultimately the fact is VZW has competition, so they can't really charge all that much more for the service. And for 90% or so of consumers who don't travel much at all, there is usually at least one other option providing good cell and data service.
It's going to be very interesting to see what VZW does. I feel like the growth opportunity here is not only growing overall market share by TAKING customers from other carriers, but also getting more existing customers to jump into data plans. To me trying to squeeze a few more bucks out of existing smartphone users, and actually losing customers (along with their more lucrative voice & text plans) is a sub-optimal strategy.
Of course that doesn't mean companies can and won't make bad business decisions. Just kind of floors me that they see the value in their current offerings as they said point blank they've kept prices here to lure IPhone customers from AT&T, but basically said "we planned to screw them (and all our other users) later all along". Seems short-sighted.
My point was that requiring a 4G data plan or moving to tiered pricing wouldn't be a breach of contract since data isn't even in the contract.
Agreed. I'm in marketing myself and I think it's a mistake to link commercials and ads to the release date. These are often ordered weeks in advance so an ad piece hitting today could have been ordered three weeks ago.It looks to me like this thread is suppose to be discussing the HTC Thunderbolt commercial. Now I understand you can only say so much about the commercial and I don't mind the way this is drifting, but please don't get into a discussion on the release date. Thank you for your understanding.