I think you misread the post. Either that or you are trying to put words into my mouth.
In a nut shell you guys are making the case that its fair to be charged $20 extra per bag of groceries if you use your own bag
If you see an outrageous price for a bottle of milk at the grocery store, you either buy it somewhere else or just don't get milk. I'm willing to bet you don't just walk out without paying simply because you thought the price was unfair.
Fairness is irrelevant to the argument. No one HAS to have tether. No one really even has to have smartphone data.
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.
No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.
Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/
Analogies are only correct to the ones who make them, and the ones who side with the creator of the analogy and the topic at hand.![]()
I think you misread the post. Either that or you are trying to put words into my mouth.
I didn't misread anything. You responded to a post that wasn't directed at you.
To your other point, yes, I agree that as a for profit-business VZW is legally and contractually within their right to do what they are doing regarding tether. Whether you disagree or think what VZW is doing is unfair doesn't justify stealing and all the whining. And, yes, I can argue VZW is completely justified in their actions while disagreeing or being disappointed with the policy. I can either accept it or vote with my wallet taking my business elsewhere.
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.
No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.
Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/
A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.
Analogies are only correct to the ones who make them, and the ones who side with the creator of the analogy and the topic at hand.![]()
Ehhh, either it's apples-to-apples or people just don't like fruit.:icon_ banana:
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.
No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.
Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/
A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.
No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.
Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/
A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.
You are right disagreeing with someone is ok I love a good debate. It is when multiple people attack someone who tries to say big red is trying to break one off in us that I have a problem with.
Sent from my Droid