What's new
DroidForums.net | Android Forum & News

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

VZW disabling tethering apps from market

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tethering without paying for a tethering plan is like dodging the Draft, or driving over the speed limit?

Sent from my unrooted DroidX using DroidForums app
 
I think you misread the post. Either that or you are trying to put words into my mouth.

I didn't misread anything. You responded to a post that wasn't directed at you.

To your other point, yes, I agree that as a for profit-business VZW is legally and contractually within their right to do what they are doing regarding tether. Whether you disagree or think what VZW is doing is unfair doesn't justify stealing and all the whining. And, yes, I can argue VZW is completely justified in their actions while disagreeing or being disappointed with the policy. I can either accept it or vote with my wallet taking my business elsewhere.
 
They are within their right, but a user should be within their right to use another program to do a simple tether for information to be passed on to a computer. The hacks to use Verizons own app without paying should be dealt with, and not allowed.

Why is it "illegal" to stream your slingbox onto your phone, and use ~384kbps. But not illegal to stream to your PC screen at the same bitrate? It's a terrible double standard and users are acting appropriately and using their paid for data in the way that suits them best.
 
In a nut shell you guys are making the case that its fair to be charged $20 extra per bag of groceries if you use your own bag

If you see an outrageous price for a bottle of milk at the grocery store, you either buy it somewhere else or just don't get milk. I'm willing to bet you don't just walk out without paying simply because you thought the price was unfair.

Fairness is irrelevant to the argument. No one HAS to have tether. No one really even has to have smartphone data.

Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.

No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.

Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man


/*
unless explicitly stated, sent from my liberated X.
mm, gingerbread ^_^
*/
 
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.

No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.

Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/

A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.
 
Analogies are only correct to the ones who make them, and the ones who side with the creator of the analogy and the topic at hand. :p
 
I think you misread the post. Either that or you are trying to put words into my mouth.

I didn't misread anything. You responded to a post that wasn't directed at you.

To your other point, yes, I agree that as a for profit-business VZW is legally and contractually within their right to do what they are doing regarding tether. Whether you disagree or think what VZW is doing is unfair doesn't justify stealing and all the whining. And, yes, I can argue VZW is completely justified in their actions while disagreeing or being disappointed with the policy. I can either accept it or vote with my wallet taking my business elsewhere.

Then you are trying to put words into my mouth. LIKE I SAID if someone has an opinion that differs than Verizon gets flamed by someone like you even when it is something simple as me saying you are flaming people you drag it back to tethering.

Proving my point exactly. I don't agree that Verizon is whining to Google to take the apps off. Piss on the Guy who developed it he should not be allowed to sell his product. Because of that you will pick apart my post and make sill remarks to try and make me look like a thief. So if we want to point fingers for something take a look at the topic name. It is about Verizon having tethered apps off market not you disagree with Verizon so you will be treated like a convicted criminal.

Sent from my Droid
 
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.

No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.

Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/

A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.

I stand corrected. You didn't say that. You have my apologies bro.

/*
unless explicitly stated, sent from my liberated X.
mm, gingerbread ^_^
*/
 
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.

No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.

Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/

A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.

You are right disagreeing with someone is ok I love a good debate. It is when multiple people attack someone who tries to say big red is trying to break one off in us that I have a problem with.

Sent from my Droid
 
Dude you're the who said it - quit using the stupid analagies. Especially those, because they're flawed and lopsided to support your godly, self-righteous stance. Your morality serves as an example of the good person we should all strive to be.

No wonder your post count is so high when you triple post everywhere.

Everyone keeps trying to move this thread away from flames but you insist on it. You want to burn everyone with an opinion other than your own. Drop it man*/

A) I'm not the one who made the comment about analogies.
B) I'm not flaming anyone. Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are flaming you.
C) There is absolutely nothing wrong with my analogies, aside from being apparently impossible to make the simple simple enough for some.

You are right disagreeing with someone is ok I love a good debate. It is when multiple people attack someone who tries to say big red is trying to break one off in us that I have a problem with.

Sent from my Droid

Amen.


/*
unless explicitly stated, sent from my liberated X.
mm, gingerbread ^_^
*/
 
If tethering is against big V law then we must all be Outlaws!!!!! Yeah!!

I am ok with that.

Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top