I agree, but it was still a legal hit. I was at that game and I even tweeted (you can go back and look if you don't believe me) "Cooke will be suspended for that hit" as soon as it happened.Cool, was wondering when this was coming to android. Thanks for the heads up.
The app has a link to let you sign up for the Matt Cooke Fan Club direct!
Actually, as a lifelong PENS fan, I can't and won't defend that hit. Regardless of whether there was a rule in place or not, there are hits you just don't take. And that was one of them. Hopefully, Savard makes it back quicker than it looks now. And more importanly, hopefully he has no lingering effects and gets back to leading a normal life now.
That being said, that one hit doesn't make the Penguins a dirty organization.
Agreed, it doesn't make them a dirty organization. But Cooke is a dirty player. The NHL would be much better without his kind in the league. And before this becomes PENS bashing (oops... too late) EVERY TEAM has these types.
The NHL tied their hands from being able to suspend Cooke when Richards wasn't suspended for basically the same infraction. I think there is a rule that could have been applied, something about hitting an unexpecting player. I don't know exactly what the rule or wording is, but there was a lot of discussion about it on talk radio here in the Burgh. Regardless, since Richards wasn't disciplined, neither was Cooke.
I'd like to see the new rule regarding head shots get on the books this year, today rather than later. All this talk about needing to go through proper channels is bull. When Avery waved his stick in front of Brodeur, Bettman made of his few right decisions and clarified that an existing rule would be used. He could easily do the same here.