windstrings
Active Member
I got pretty deep in the plasma/lcd wars when I bought both of my large screen LCD's.
I personally prefer LCD for very large screens as the detail indeed interprets into crispness and the technology has just gotten so good they look better under most lighting conditions.
HOWEVER, with the much smaller screen the rules would seem to indicate the LCD would be even better for viewing... however, the gallery just plain sucks now on the droid and you cannot assess quality pictures with that crappy software.
Sometimes you have to forget all the technical "proof" the engineers present and simply see which one "looks" the best to your eyes.
The brain plays by different rules of logic and good sense.
The brain has amazing interpretive skills and likes what it sees the most "real life".
Bold color saturation and clean contrast is sometimes more important than detail.
When we look at the world through our eyes, we dont' have a milk screen over our eyes and the natural eyes have amazing abilities to see diversities of contrast that until of late cameras cannot touch.
The bottom line..... reality is often the sum of more than we understand..... what "looks" best to our eyes is what really matters, regardless of the science behind either camp.
Its kinda like taking an engineer with his graph who explains while you can't climb a mountain.. and the person that doesn't know any better does it anyway.
We can argue someones belief all day and we can argue someones knowledge, but whether discussing religion or life... we cannot argue someones experience of what they know.
Just compare the two and see what you like... color blind charts alone prove we don't all see the same.
I personally prefer LCD for very large screens as the detail indeed interprets into crispness and the technology has just gotten so good they look better under most lighting conditions.
HOWEVER, with the much smaller screen the rules would seem to indicate the LCD would be even better for viewing... however, the gallery just plain sucks now on the droid and you cannot assess quality pictures with that crappy software.
Sometimes you have to forget all the technical "proof" the engineers present and simply see which one "looks" the best to your eyes.
The brain plays by different rules of logic and good sense.
The brain has amazing interpretive skills and likes what it sees the most "real life".
Bold color saturation and clean contrast is sometimes more important than detail.
When we look at the world through our eyes, we dont' have a milk screen over our eyes and the natural eyes have amazing abilities to see diversities of contrast that until of late cameras cannot touch.
The bottom line..... reality is often the sum of more than we understand..... what "looks" best to our eyes is what really matters, regardless of the science behind either camp.
Its kinda like taking an engineer with his graph who explains while you can't climb a mountain.. and the person that doesn't know any better does it anyway.
We can argue someones belief all day and we can argue someones knowledge, but whether discussing religion or life... we cannot argue someones experience of what they know.
Just compare the two and see what you like... color blind charts alone prove we don't all see the same.
Last edited:
