Lol I had PM'd Malvado about that user. Everything he/she posted since joining today was spam. Thanks!
No problem. Just another day the office lol.
Lol I had PM'd Malvado about that user. Everything he/she posted since joining today was spam. Thanks!
We're not sure just what the plans are for this hardware, but we'll definitely be looking to find more information to help flesh-out our picture of it. Might there just be a new battery, or could Motorola have other changes (like a new HD display) in store for the phone?
Oh dear....now instead of "Moto should let me swap my Bionic for the Razr" we'll be hearing "Moto should let me swap my Razr for the RazrMaxx".
instead of releasing phone after phone with nearly the same exact specs within 2 months of eachother. who not release a solid piece of work and then working to make the next phone even better and very different than that?
someone should sue moto for false advertisement then lolActually moto had a number of complaints that when thrown against a building not only did the Razr not cut said building down, but it broke. The Max will be able to cut through anything except diamond and some of the more durable metals, at least that's what I heard.
In all seriousness another rumored device already is pretty crazy. I like variety but more time between new device cycles would not be a bad thing IMO.
someone should sue moto for false advertisement then lol
Personally, devices rolling out faster is a good thing because it gets us that much closer to made-to-order.
I don't get all the whining, though. No one complains when they buy a computer and 2 months later a better processor, better hard drive, or more ram comes out at a better price. It's just the way things are. And if you want to waste $600 every few months, no one is stopping you.
While the specs may not vary drasticly from model to model, the form factors seem to be a bit different, and let's not forget, that is one of the things that makes android unique. We are not limited to a single device or form factor for an entire year or two as is the case with the iPhone.instead of releasing phone after phone with nearly the same exact specs within 2 months of eachother. who not release a solid piece of work and then working to make the next phone even better and very different than that?
I get what you mean but there is a big difference between computer processors and SoC processors. With a computer cpu, if a new model drops in 2 months that has decreased power usage by 2 watts, for example, it is really not a big deal. You don't look at it and think, oh thats going to bring my electric bill down a few bucks. But when dealing with SoC, 2 watts could mean 45 minuets of extra talk time, for example. It could mean 10 min more data usage, and say it jumps 300Mhz that can mean a noticeable increase where as with a desktop/laptop cpu you would see little real world improvement. The only place you really notice it is in benchmark scores. Also, computers based CPUs are significantly more powerful to begin with.I could have bought a Core 2 Quad Q6600 back when it was released, and have a reasonably powerful cpu even today. But if I bought a phone with a top of the line SoC at the same time, it would struggle to run gingerbread or ICS. I think the D1 is a good example of this from the sounds of it. I don't recall exactly when the D1 was releases but it is an aging device that seems to be on it's last leg.Personally, devices rolling out faster is a good thing because it gets us that much closer to made-to-order.
I don't get all the whining, though. No one complains when they buy a computer and 2 months later a better processor, better hard drive, or more ram comes out at a better price. It's just the way things are. And if you want to waste $600 every few months, no one is stopping you.