R
RETG
Guest
I read, either that article or another article, that reasoned since LTE is a stronger signal than 3G it will reduce battery consumption. We all know that weak radio signals drain the battery faster than a strong signal.
However, not in the article, but in my mind is the fact that if you are on a LTE phone, and you are on the fringe area, it might drain just as fast, and then you will eventually shift to 3G. But the fringe area for LTE might be farther out than for 3G. (My reasoning, certainly not scientific.)
Let's face it, it will be years before the existing Verizon 3G network is fully LTE capable, and where I live, I do no expect to see LTE until early 2012. (But, I would much rather live here than in any of the areas that will have LTE by next summerdancedroid.)
As for the HTC phone. I really like HTC phones, good looking, nice features, but terrible reception in fringe areas with the phone. If they can fix that, I would seriously consider one in the future. But the Incredible a friend has, drops phone signals a few miles before my X.
However, not in the article, but in my mind is the fact that if you are on a LTE phone, and you are on the fringe area, it might drain just as fast, and then you will eventually shift to 3G. But the fringe area for LTE might be farther out than for 3G. (My reasoning, certainly not scientific.)
Let's face it, it will be years before the existing Verizon 3G network is fully LTE capable, and where I live, I do no expect to see LTE until early 2012. (But, I would much rather live here than in any of the areas that will have LTE by next summerdancedroid.)
As for the HTC phone. I really like HTC phones, good looking, nice features, but terrible reception in fringe areas with the phone. If they can fix that, I would seriously consider one in the future. But the Incredible a friend has, drops phone signals a few miles before my X.