My moto charger is hard to read but says I believe output 5.1v 850ma. My moms LG that I use says output 5.1v 0.7a. So what's the difference? According to FoxKats post I should be fine cuz the voltage is the same rating right?
Sent from my DROID3 using DroidForums
You are right, to a point. The voltage is the same, and the amperage is at least as much as your Moto charger (though I am wondering what charger?), but there is nothing on any of these chargers that talk about how CLEAN the waveform of power is. Just because LG is a top manufacturer, and so is Motorola, doesn't mean both chargers will be comparably good at smoothing out the spikes and noise on the power waveform. Since these devices use a Capacitive Touch display, and they are extra-sensitive to such things as dirty current, RF interference, moisture, dirt, etc., we'd do ourselves good to stay away from using power supplies that aren't designed specifically for these devices.
Also, having more amperage (either ###ma or 0.##a), isn't necessarily a good thing either. MY RAZR charger, the one that came with it in the box is rated at 750ma (or 0.75a). Motorola obviously chose 750ma for a reason, since the ones that came with my Droid 1 and Droid 2 both were 850ma. A lower amperage means slower charge, which can be translated into many different and beneficial things. For instance, lower charge rate will heat the battery up less, it will give the battery a better chance to move all the free ions into their available spaces to store power more efficiently, it will draw less current from the wall (not really a concern considering the minute amount it pulls, but still...), it will likely be physically smaller (it's tiny for mine, ). and perhaps other reasons I can't come up with at the moment.
See below. The cute little cube charger with the folding power prongs...RAZR!! The other one, D1/D2.
View attachment 43000View attachment 43001View attachment 43002View attachment 43003View attachment 43004