This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
There has been no mention of it, so I doubt it. Test pictures so far seem to show no adverse effect from a lack of it. Videos and low-light images scored fairly.
Well I sold my moto x 2nd gen because of the camera not being as good as it should. It reminded me of s4 having worst quality compare to s3. Even though, S4 have more megapixes..
You my friend are right. S5 had a better camera then s4 and better then xperia z line which contain camera of 21 megapixes since z1s. I think that phone is overrated and it isnt anything special.
Example how do you release Original z and then z1 in 2013 at same time??
Sony did the same mistake last year with z2 and z3 release again the same year??
Now I am hearing the same fate for z4 and z5 possibly being a release once again in 2015?
I feel like we've seen all oems settle into a certain MP range. Now it's time for them to make the other changes necessary for quality pictures. I'm not looking to enter my phone pics in art contests, but I want clear, pretty pictures.
This why manufacture need to test and work with software and lenses. Drop pixels race.. Why can apple and Microsoft can take great picture on their phone Android?? I think is Google os issue or manufacture also..
This why manufacture need to test and work with software and lenses. Drop pixels race.. Why can apple and Microsoft can take great picture on their phone Android?? I think is Google os issue or manufacture also..