This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Thing is that this plan goes far beyond of only comprising Android, it can also count towards apps as mentioned in the OP, websites, different layouts for even Netflix and menus of the sort. In fact, Im pretty sure it touches MS in someway, and there, it would be like scratching the tiger directly in their privates...
Couldn't this patent be defanged like Motorola's long standing original patent on the basic principles of a cellphone? A patent so broad that you have to let others use it (at a very reasonable price) for a fair market. Just sayin'.
I'm still vexed at how a patent this far reaching doesn't in some way violate the anti-trust laws of allowing competition and preventing a monopoly. Antitrust Laws
Aren't you already doing this, for their own good. I mean anyone I actually like or consider a friend...heck...even an acquaintance I steer away from Apple.
You have to remember just because the patent office gives them a patent it by no means is a court proven patent, which means that for them to use this patent against others the courts would have to rule that this is even a worthy patent. As we've seen time and time again Windows v Lindows... when microsoft tried to sue lindows for their name, the courts said no way because windows is too common of a name. The same thing could happen here and most likely would.
Aren't you already doing this, for their own good. I mean anyone I actually like or consider a friend...heck...even an acquaintance I steer away from Apple.
You have to remember just because the patent office gives them a patent it by no means is a court proven patent, which means that for them to use this patent against others the courts would have to rule that this is even a worthy patent. As we've seen time and time again Windows v Lindows... when microsoft tried to sue lindows for their name, the courts said no way because windows is too common of a name. The same thing could happen here and most likely would.
Everything that you've said is true. The only issue is that we have judges allowing injunctions to be put in place until the validity of the patent can be determined one way or the other and whether other companies are actually in violation of them. It's quite strange with the way that Microsoft was done over years ago that Apple has received so much support in this patent mongering from Federal courts.
This is utterly ridiculous, one way or another Apple is going to dig their own grave. They will either get big Microsoft coming after them (Windows phone and now Windows 8 all use multi-touch) or they will catch an antitrust lawsuit from the US government
Please please us by reopening your lawsuit with the conniving company known as Apple for stealing their company name from you and the other Beatles and insist they change it to something else immediately! Assle comes to mind, but you may find that distasteful as it's spelling is still too close to the fine name of your record company.
Sincerely,
Please please us by reopening your lawsuit with the conniving company known as Apple for stealing their company name from you and the other Beatles and insist they change it to something else immediately! Assle comes to mind, but you may find that distasteful as it's spelling is still too close to the fine name of your record company.
Sincerely,
You're going to see a LOT of stupid patents in the coming months as the USPTO is changing from a "first to invent" system to a "first to file". Many companies are scrambling to get as many patents as they can under the current laws.