acousticshade
Active Member
It's not as bad as the internet makes it seem, acoustic. If you'll be traveling in fringe areas a lot then it's something to consider, but if you're mostly in the metro part of any urban area you have nothing to worry about. Though again, if you do frequent low signal areas, then it might be an issue.
Just don't want people thinking their signal can cut out at any time with this phone because of a bad antenna. My apartment is a dead zone, I only get service in about half of it. I used to have a Rezound and I can't say I notice a HUGE difference, though it does seem to maybe cut in and out a bit more than my Rezound if I move around. But again, it's not bad enough to where I'm thinking about changing phones...the signal here just sucks in general.
Thanks k1. My house will probably be ok, but I do travel and work quite a bit through many fringe areas that are very rural (Michigan's upper penninsula), so it is a concern of mine. $200 price difference is nothing to scoff at either.
On the other hand, if I can get similar quality video as a go-pro camera, $200 more is definately worth it. I would guess that even an older go-pro probably has better quality video due to better optics and perhaps stabilization. Has anyone seen a comparison of the two?