Why would anyone buy a new phone at full retail price every 3 months to begin with? If you're looking to spend money like that I can sell you prime ocean front property in Wyoming LOL
Sent from my rooted and Safe Strapped Motor DROID RAZR
I said three phones a year which is one every four months. The $1000 I mentioned was spent on two phones, I used my last annual upgrade on the Bionic on launch day for $340, and then I paid about $700 for the Razr (not including cases and screen protectors for each as well). I paid full price for the Razr because I could not stand the problems that my Bionic had and I was not about to accept a CLNR replacement for a phone that was $340 and two weeks old, not to mention the problems would not be fixed with a CLNR anyways. This year, it seemed like every 2-3 months, a new flagship for each manufacturer was introduced albeit they featured only marginal improvements. It makes customers mad when a company doesn’t put a lot of effort in a long term purchase product. Did Motorola build my Bionic to last me two years? Hell no. I’m sure it would have worked as phone for two years but would it keep up with the times? No, it was already outdated when it came out. It’s impossible for manufacturers to future proof a phone, yes, especially with the constant advancements made with them. However, instead of delaying the Bionic for months, redesigning it etc., they should have just came out with the Razr. For example, they knew screens and battery life were important to people, they already had the Razr screen finalized when they produced the Bionic but instead they chose to produce a phone that was already outdated with an inferior screen and tons of radio problems, market it as “the machine that rules all machines” yet, less than two months later, it got “ruled” by the Razr and again two months later after the razr launch, the MAXX is already on sale. I just find it annoying that Motorola and others cannot seem to make a phone that is good for longer than two months. I would much rather pay $299 for a phone that won’t be outclassed by the same manufacturer two months later that is not filled with huge bugs that affect everyday usability (Bionic radios) and that has top notch hardware. It might be outdone in a few months but a 1.5ghz processor versus 1.2 doesn’t matter to me. However, a phone with a working radio, camera and better screen do. What I meant is if manufacturers keep pulling the new phone every two months thing, who is going to buy them? Obviously tons of people become eligible for an upgrade everyday but not everyone is going to buy the newest $300 phone, a lot of them are going to buy last months flagship phone for $200 and only the affluent tech savvy people are going to keep buying the newest phone every few months. I don’t plan on buying a new phone at least until this summer (if there is something that majorly trumps my razr). In my opinion, the only thing the razr lacks is NFC (no big deal for me atm) and a real HD screen, and maybe a bigger battery..oh wait. So anyways the point of this long rant is I want my annual upgrade back lol. It would lessen the effect of buyers remorse and keep me a little happier knowing I can upgrade again in 12 months versus two years. If they did this, I imagine they would have less phone calls *****ing for a newer phone because they just bought this one. just my two cents.