They should have named it she Galaxy 4S! See what I did there?!
Samsung throws exorbitant amounts of cash into advertising and are all over the place. Sammy will continue to dominate the Android space for a long time. They've built a brand and have pulled so far away from the pack I honestly do not know how any of the other OEM's will catch up.Well we said Samsung was the top dog and looks like the top dog may have fumbled a bit. Now can Motorola or another oem catch up or will Samsung just pick it up and score.
Just got my Moto X last week and it is BY FAR the best phone I've ever had!! Coming from a Razr HD.
... or the tons of ram (see Apple iPhone 4x, 5x).
Samsung throws exorbitant amounts of cash into advertising and are all over the place. Sammy will continue to dominate the Android space for a long time. They've built a brand and have pulled so far away from the pack I honestly do not know how any of the other OEM's will catch up.
It will take years for another OEM to build momentum, and Samsung must falter along the way for anyone to come along and steal their thunder. I personally do not see Samsung relinquishing their title for a very long time, unless they decide to move to a Tizen based smartphone (which I personally think is going to happen in the future. Just yy opinion)
Therein lies the problem. Samsung is becoming like Apple which is a really really good thing. WE are seeing that, and don't particularly like it, but your average consumer see's a brand that they know, like and trust.In this era of technology all it takes is momentum. I think if Motorola can keep on doing what they have been doing they could slowly take it from Samsung from the bottom up. I am seeing more and more people gravitate to the Motorola x those who are not phone geeks and can care less about dual core, quad core, 64 bit, etc. All people care about is a good experience. The reason many chose android was because it was not apple and it is clearly obvious that Samsung is becoming more and more like apple. People are seeing that and those wanting to get away will gravitate elsewhere to a manufacturer who can provide them an enjoyable experience. HTC is too erratic with a hit one year and a dud the next they need to find an idea and build upon it vs choosing something different every year. LG is making a rise but they look too much like Samsung vs forming their own identity. Either way it will be interesting to see how this all play out.
I've been on a bone stock Moto X from Verizon since October. It is by far the smoothest, most stable, most enjoyable smartphone experience I've had (I started way back with the original Droid on release day in Nov of 2009).After debating back and forth I ended up buying a Moto X from Swappa and it will be here in a few days. I wasnt initially impressed by the specs on it when it came out (especially the screen size, I wanted something bigger), but more and more Im hearing how great this phone is despite the middle-of-the-road specs, due to software optimization. Its more of a true google experience phone, which is what I want. I wanted the Nexus 5, but being on Verizon this is as close as Im going to get I suppose.
I've been on a bone stock Moto X from Verizon since October. It is by far the smoothest, most stable, most enjoyable smartphone experience I've had (I started way back with the original Droid on release day in Nov of 2009).
Am I one of the few that could give a rip less if the phone has a metal exterior or not? I mean, mine all go into an enclosure with an expanded battery anyway. Why should I care if the frame is metal at that point. I believe the metal frame argument is starting to look like the metal versus composite argument in cars that occurred a few years ago.