I'm here, obviously Garemlin has handled the device and has a good basis from that so his concerns are more about the long term use of the G2 VS Moto. Over the last few devices I purchased strictly Motorola for one reason and one reason alone, their radio's are the best on the market. Countless times I'd be somewhere surfing the internet or on a call next to someone who was complaining about not having service, even from the same provider (Verizon). This made me a believer since the D1.
LG hit a home run with a great device with a solid build and blistering features, but what surprised me the most and what was my biggest fear about going away from Motorola was the signal strength because I live in a weak service area (an island). It's not just a good runner up with Moto, not only does it match Moto, but exceeds it. Based on the signal strength VS the Bionic I had which smoked my girlfriends S4, it's actually better. In places where I'd lose 4G I keep 4G, in places where I had no signal I keep 3G. In fact compared to my Bionic which was anywhere from 9-14% without signal based on battery stats throughout my work day, I now show that I never lose signal at all. Ever. In a building, in a bathroom, in an industrial kitchen, a basement...I keep service.
That to me is worth more than any processor, feature set, or ram figure... the phone works.
Of course I could list my quibbles and complaints as anyone can about anything, but even these things are so minor in scale compared to the devices of yore it's not even worth mentioning, and this is the first time I've held a phone and thought to myself yes, this is actually short term future proof. Go get a G2 and if you find it's not for you return it. I'd be shocked if you did.