The fcc is asking Verizon to explain their decision to throttle some users data because as part of them being awarded part of the old analog tv frequencies they agreed to not hinder the data flow in any way shape or form. The post I was replying to stated Verizon could use the fact that Sprint will now throttle data as an excuse to get away with doing it themselves. To my knowledge Sprint had no such agreement to not hinder their data flow on the part of the frequency pie they were awarded.Why would Sprint do that?
TMo does (or used to) something similar with speeds slowing down after 5-10gigs of data. They all have the same basic problem - how to provide plans for heavy power users while protecting themselves against abusers who use it as a home ISP and run-up 100gigs+ a month
Sent from my LG-D801 using Tapatalk