What's new
DroidForums.net | Android Forum & News

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[Urgent] Remove 3g Hack

People that tether and use a ton of data deserve it, same with people that apply to hack that removes throttling. It is all bad news and is not helping us to unlock any bootloaders.

No, they don't. Well people that tether don't. Uncapping however, is a different story. Remember when broadband first came out, and supposedly the cable companies were suppose to charge a premium if they found out you were using a router. It said right in my old contract that using a router was forbidden unless it was provided by the cable company. And even then, it was an additional full price subscription per additional PC. I wish I was joking, but I'm dead serious.

It's called market demand. People are demanding that tethering be allowed. And quite frankly, Verizon would be in deep trouble if we actually had a true open market in the wireless industry.

The biggest argument against tethering is that it slows the network down.

This exact same argument was used when broadband first came out. It was said if broadband went mainstream, the internet would actually collapse, because there wasn't enough bandwidth. It was a valid concern at the time since most datacenter's only had T1 connections, and broadband speed was generally faster than a single T1. They were right about one thing, broadband did change the internet alright, except it caused it to thrive more than ever, and the predictions of doom never came.

Maybe perhaps for now it would cause higher congestion, but necessity is the mother of invention.

But ultimately, this is a net neutrality argument. Verizon thinks it should have the right to control how their customers use the bandwidth they (the customers) are paying for. I am buying the ability to access the internet from my phone. How I use that connection is my own business.

Imagine if land-line phone companies charged you an additional monthly fee for every single jack you have installed. Then, when they found out you had bypassed their outrageous fees by plugging a splitter and installing the jacks yourself, cut your service off.

Or even better, imagine if land-line companies blocked your ability to send faxes unless you bought a "fax package" from them. Well, there is a reason they don't do that (or they probably would) It's illegal. They are not allowed to prevent you from calling someone.
 
Last edited:
People that tether and use a ton of data deserve it, same with people that apply to hack that removes throttling. It is all bad news and is not helping us to unlock any bootloaders.

No, they don't. Well people that tether don't. Uncapping however, is a different story. Remember when broadband first came out, and supposedly the cable companies were suppose to charge a premium if they found out you were using a router. It said right in my old contract that using a router was forbidden unless it was provided by the cable company. And even then, it was an additional full price subscription per additional PC. I wish I was joking, but I'm dead serious.

It's called market demand. People are demanding that tethering be allowed. And quite frankly, Verizon would be in deep trouble if we actually had a true open market in the wireless industry.

The biggest argument against tethering is that it slows the network down.

This exact same argument was used when broadband first came out. It was said if broadband went mainstream, the internet would actually collapse, because there wasn't enough bandwidth. It was a valid concern at the time since most datacenter's only had T1 connections, and broadband speed was generally faster than a single T1. They were right about one thing, broadband did change the internet alright, except it caused it to thrive more than ever, and the predictions of doom never came.

Maybe perhaps for now it would cause higher congestion, but necessity is the mother of invention.

But ultimately, this is a net neutrality argument. Verizon thinks it should have the right to control how their customers use the bandwidth they (the customers) are paying for. I am buying the ability to access the internet from my phone. How I use that connection is my own business.

Imagine if land-line phone companies charged you an additional monthly fee for every single jack you have installed. Then, when they found out you had bypassed their outrageous fees by plugging a splitter and installing the jacks yourself, cut your service off.

Or even better, imagine if land-line companies blocked your ability to send faxes unless you bought a "fax package" from them. Well, there is a reason they don't do that (or they probably would) It's illegal. They are not allowed to prevent you from calling someone.

Took the words right out mouth. If you were getting individual speeds per device that is connecting to your phone, then I could understand charging for tethering. Wireless carriers are trying to milk every last penny out of customers. There is no difference in tethering vs connecting a wireless router to your broadband connection at home.
 
these should all be closed and all you fear mongers should be band. I'm so sick of it. At least we see what DF has become. Just a place to spread fear and waste time. Df is no longer relevant and just supporting the hype.
 
You are going to wake up one day with the "can you hear me now" guy standing at the foot of your bed quoting the ToS to you and saying...."can you hear me now?"



Bwaahahahahaha!!! That's hilarious!
 
Sorry but why would nvram hack affect download speeds? It just allows u to download for free, not faster... Unless I missed something.

Sent from my DROIDX using DroidForums

Anyone?

Sent from my DROIDX using DroidForums

That's my understanding. From reading p3's tweets, it seems like something in the thunderbolt hacks allowed for really high downloads while tethered. I guess that's what may have raised the initial "flag" at verizon.

This is just a precaution, since you must pay for tethering, I assume that vzw looks for unusually high data usage, then investigates. As long as you don't have the nvram hack still applied when they start prying, then you won't look as bad, and theres not link back to tbh so they can keep doing what they do.
 
zzzz .... still tethering .... these threads are starting to bore me


i was teathering on wireless tether 2.3 with out problems then one day i started the tether, let my friend connect his lamepod and couldnt browse,so i closed the tether app opened the browser and tried to go to the site he was trying, instead all i got was the vzw site telling my to buy tethering, only option available on the page, and every site i went to redirected me, si i pulled my battery, uninstalled 2.3 and browsing was restored, but since i can not use any version of wireless tether takes me strait to vzw site.

as a side note easy tether pro while not wireless still works. so im holding out on paying for tethering from vzw, my theory unlimited means without limits and limiting my usage for more money sounds like vzw needs a dictionary

hey vzw:
unlimited
un·lim·it·ed

   [uhn-lim-i-tid] Show IPA
–adjective 1. not limited; unrestricted; unconfined: unlimited trade.

2. boundless; infinite; vast: the unlimited skies.

3. without any qualification or exception; unconditional.


.
 
Back
Top