I'm pretty darn familiar with Android
I'm not really replying whether I support either side, just pointing out that its a grey area.
Since you know Android well.. I have a question....
I have not done a definitive test as I think the time span to kill a battery is so long it hard to control all the variables.
But how often do those social apps like friends etc try to come on?
I have them set to autokill anytime the screen is on with task killer by rhythm software, but whats haunting me is I dont know if they are trying to reactivate every 5 minutes "and immediately getting killed" or if they only try when the phone comes out of sleep?
If they are constantly trying to reactive and getting killed and trying to reactive again and getting killed, I can see how that would eat up lots of battery.
On the other hand if they only try to activate when they sense the phone is coming out of sleep or being used then I see the benefit of killing them when the phone is sat down and the screen goes blank.
I have turned off my "always mobile on data" setting and that alone has nearly doubled my battery life as I don't use those apps that need a constant data link anyway. Upon first trial I have gone from 12 - 18 hours of use to 28... and thats with playing with my video camera for about 20 min. My gmail and text seem to work perfectly.
Just asking because I don't know if I want to:
A. Continue to auto kill undesirable or unused apps
B. Merely kill them manually upon first reboots so they aren't running unless they reactivate themselves.
C. Not use task manager at all.
I would appreciate suggestions from someone who knows the innerworkings of Android rather than mere speculation and opinions from folks such as myself who don't really know.
I have used task manager and at times I swear it makes things run smoother, other times it seems to work better without it.... I can't tell if its placebo effect or if there are variables I can't monitor.
I guess a good question would be.. what do you do with your phone and why?
==============
Another thought:
After turning off the "mobile data always on" the battery life is as good if not better than the Droid moto.
That begs the question... Does the moto not even utilize that option in the first place?
Could be one reason why social apps work so well on the Inc verses the Moto and would also explain the battery descrepencies other than the 100mah difference in size.