IMHO, the failure to include wireless charging is a mistake. As DMX pointed out, lots of people have spent good money to include wireless charging into their daily routine. For them, the convenience and ease of implementation factor may be even more important than the simple lack of a cord. You sit it down, it charges... You pick it up and go.
Also, the money they've spent for those QI chargers is money that they don't want to go to waste so quickly. QI hasn't been out all that long, so the sting of the initial cost is still tingling the nervous system. If it were me, I'd be saying to myself what a waste of good money to buy a phone now, after the fact, that doesn't have wireless charging. It will hurt sales some, I believe. It really has to.
Furthermore, I think @Mustang02 said it best. Most people like to know where something is all the time, and so having a "station" or QI pad that's there at all times helps you to keep your phone in a place where you know to go for it. I do find myself carrying the wall warts from place to place at times, and then trying to remember exactly where I last left it, or where I'm plugged in. This is why I have tried to keep the main "station" at my bedside.
That said, adding wireless charging to this device shouldn't be all that difficult. It's a very small and flat coil, a couple leads that connect inside and you're done. Now QuickCharge 2.0 and wireless combined, that's a different story. If the device is already capable of QC2.0, in all likelihood changing to wireless will not allow the device to conform to the QC2.0 standard but will instead revert to the standard charging rate while on the wireless pad. This may not be a big deal for many since the pad is more of a landing place rather than a station for many.
Also, the money they've spent for those QI chargers is money that they don't want to go to waste so quickly. QI hasn't been out all that long, so the sting of the initial cost is still tingling the nervous system. If it were me, I'd be saying to myself what a waste of good money to buy a phone now, after the fact, that doesn't have wireless charging. It will hurt sales some, I believe. It really has to.
Furthermore, I think @Mustang02 said it best. Most people like to know where something is all the time, and so having a "station" or QI pad that's there at all times helps you to keep your phone in a place where you know to go for it. I do find myself carrying the wall warts from place to place at times, and then trying to remember exactly where I last left it, or where I'm plugged in. This is why I have tried to keep the main "station" at my bedside.
That said, adding wireless charging to this device shouldn't be all that difficult. It's a very small and flat coil, a couple leads that connect inside and you're done. Now QuickCharge 2.0 and wireless combined, that's a different story. If the device is already capable of QC2.0, in all likelihood changing to wireless will not allow the device to conform to the QC2.0 standard but will instead revert to the standard charging rate while on the wireless pad. This may not be a big deal for many since the pad is more of a landing place rather than a station for many.