kptphalkon
Active Member
Well a decent way to check your signal quality is to download the speedtest app and it will tell you your latency and download/upload speed, which is a relative indicator of your network link quality.
Here in (south edge of) parma ohio i manage ~65 Kb down, 80 up at best. Over in the more densely populated lakewood i will get twice those speeds most of the day, and off peak speeds will closely match the theoretical ev-do A peak about 75% of the time (about 240-265 Kb down, maybe 200 up)
Also a latency over 200 ms is a pretty bad sign unless your area is very congested most of the day.
Edit: i dont care what cell network techs consider good or best,
-55 dBm is very awesome coverage, usually gives (me) between 120 and 80 millisecond latency in theoretical tests. Great download speeds in a heavily covered area, can stream most if not all videos with no rebuffering
-70 is decent, does limit speed
-85 and you will notice much slower downloads and browsing
-90 and below and you will try to break your phone in anger.
Sent from the Blue Falcon cockpit on my Fission 2.4.3 D2G
Here in (south edge of) parma ohio i manage ~65 Kb down, 80 up at best. Over in the more densely populated lakewood i will get twice those speeds most of the day, and off peak speeds will closely match the theoretical ev-do A peak about 75% of the time (about 240-265 Kb down, maybe 200 up)
Also a latency over 200 ms is a pretty bad sign unless your area is very congested most of the day.
Edit: i dont care what cell network techs consider good or best,
-55 dBm is very awesome coverage, usually gives (me) between 120 and 80 millisecond latency in theoretical tests. Great download speeds in a heavily covered area, can stream most if not all videos with no rebuffering
-70 is decent, does limit speed
-85 and you will notice much slower downloads and browsing
-90 and below and you will try to break your phone in anger.
Sent from the Blue Falcon cockpit on my Fission 2.4.3 D2G