Very good article!
re: The comments in this thread...It always makes me laugh when I read threads that debate dominance in the smartphone world. Fanboys calling fanboys "fanboys" never becomes less funny to me. Also, every thread, of this kind, is guaranteed to have some form of name-calling in it. The world of smartphones has become a very passionate marketplace.
Stripping out rhetoric and passion, and looking at this strictly from a market perspective, this is what I think:
Apple: You might not like Jobs (for whatever reason), but it is a fact that Apple set the standard in personal media and smartphone devices as we know them today (iPod, iPhone, etc..). What's brilliant is the point at which Apple begins influencing people that their brand is "THE" brand to have/want/need. How many kids ask for Apple devices at Christmas time or birthdays? So, Junior gets an iPod Shuffle, then in a couple of years wants a Mini or Touch. After living with and using those devices for years, what smartphone do you think that Junior will be drawn to when he/she comes of age?
RIM: Lives and breaths on their stronghold of the corporate world. However, Google and Apple are getting closer to breaking that stronghold with enhanced Enterprise Server integration. I have owned a couple of Blackberry devices as I need instant accessibility to my corporate email, calendar, and contacts. I was concerned about switching to the Droid because I couldn't go without that. There are a few things that BB does better, in that regard, but after having my D1 since November, I can honestly say I don't miss my BB devices. RIM needs to come up with something big to stay in the game.
Palm: Is a company that blew it. I used to love Palm. I had a couple of their PIM devices before smartphones were popular...and my first smartphone was a Palm Treo. It's really a shame that a company with great ideas and a nice OS fell to the bottom of the pack. That's what bad marketing and inferior hardware will do to a company.
Google/Android: I still own the same D1 I bought the morning of launch day. I chose the D1 as I wanted a better web browsing experience than I had with my BB. I could have chosen the BB Storm, but didn't like the feel of it as much as the D1. I can honestly say that, had an iPhone been available on VZW at the time, I'm not sure if I would have my D1 now or the iPhone. I wasn't going to leave VZW though. I've been a Sprint and AT&T customer and have traveled all over the country while being on those networks. My experience has been that VZW is the most reliable. Knowing what I know now, and living with my Droid for nearly a year, I'm glad I made the choice I did. I am amazed at the strides Android has made in such a short period of time.
My opinion is that a VZW iPhone will have a significant effect on Android, and certainly AT&T. Android will continue to be a contender, but will most likely experience a decline in market share unless Google releases something irresistible in that same time period.
re: The comments in this thread...It always makes me laugh when I read threads that debate dominance in the smartphone world. Fanboys calling fanboys "fanboys" never becomes less funny to me. Also, every thread, of this kind, is guaranteed to have some form of name-calling in it. The world of smartphones has become a very passionate marketplace.
Stripping out rhetoric and passion, and looking at this strictly from a market perspective, this is what I think:
Apple: You might not like Jobs (for whatever reason), but it is a fact that Apple set the standard in personal media and smartphone devices as we know them today (iPod, iPhone, etc..). What's brilliant is the point at which Apple begins influencing people that their brand is "THE" brand to have/want/need. How many kids ask for Apple devices at Christmas time or birthdays? So, Junior gets an iPod Shuffle, then in a couple of years wants a Mini or Touch. After living with and using those devices for years, what smartphone do you think that Junior will be drawn to when he/she comes of age?
RIM: Lives and breaths on their stronghold of the corporate world. However, Google and Apple are getting closer to breaking that stronghold with enhanced Enterprise Server integration. I have owned a couple of Blackberry devices as I need instant accessibility to my corporate email, calendar, and contacts. I was concerned about switching to the Droid because I couldn't go without that. There are a few things that BB does better, in that regard, but after having my D1 since November, I can honestly say I don't miss my BB devices. RIM needs to come up with something big to stay in the game.
Palm: Is a company that blew it. I used to love Palm. I had a couple of their PIM devices before smartphones were popular...and my first smartphone was a Palm Treo. It's really a shame that a company with great ideas and a nice OS fell to the bottom of the pack. That's what bad marketing and inferior hardware will do to a company.
Google/Android: I still own the same D1 I bought the morning of launch day. I chose the D1 as I wanted a better web browsing experience than I had with my BB. I could have chosen the BB Storm, but didn't like the feel of it as much as the D1. I can honestly say that, had an iPhone been available on VZW at the time, I'm not sure if I would have my D1 now or the iPhone. I wasn't going to leave VZW though. I've been a Sprint and AT&T customer and have traveled all over the country while being on those networks. My experience has been that VZW is the most reliable. Knowing what I know now, and living with my Droid for nearly a year, I'm glad I made the choice I did. I am amazed at the strides Android has made in such a short period of time.
My opinion is that a VZW iPhone will have a significant effect on Android, and certainly AT&T. Android will continue to be a contender, but will most likely experience a decline in market share unless Google releases something irresistible in that same time period.