Stelv
Silver Member
IMO I think Moto make's some ugly looking phones. Samsung makes the best looking ones, and they are light, slim and sleak. Just my opinion though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I tend to agree, being partial to HTC and Samsung on the aesthetics side of the equation.IMO I think Moto make's some ugly looking phones. Samsung makes the best looking ones, and they are light, slim and sleak. Just my opinion though.
Motorola and HTC make physically appealing phones. I can't stand the way Samsung designs their phones its so uggh... no creative. I love how minimal and simple the droid1 was, Droid X and most of the HTC devices. Aesthetics plays a major role in my choice. Hardware is a big factor too.
I'd have to agree - Moto's are a rectangle of plastic, whereas the HTC's, iphone (I know, but let's give credit where credit is due), and, especially, this new Samsung S2 are slim & sleek looking, very polished looking.IMO I think Moto make's some ugly looking phones. Samsung makes the best looking ones, and they are light, slim and sleak. Just my opinion though.
Evidently the Bionic is showing up in VZW's system but no sign of the S2, sadly....
Entire New DROID Lineup Appears in Verizon Device Manager: BIONIC, Incredible 2, Charge, and DROIDX2 - Droid Life: A Droid Community Blog
wondering, if the galaxy and bionic specs matched exactly, which phone, hardware-wise would be of better quality/performance ?