OK, I didn't have a side in this either, I've been playing devils advocate online and off for either side that I felt was under represented at the time. But reading BD's actual statement, and having been around for the last times this has happened, I think this is the right call.
Just basing off of the facts, namely the md5 matches of the apks, and BD's response, there really is only two possibilities. Either he blatantly stole the source (which has been stipulated by the aggrieved parties as not really being an offense if not for the insults thrown in with the theft) and continues to lie about it. Or he was incompetent to the point of not actually knowing what was going into the ROM, which I can't help but get the feeling is what he was saying in that statement.
Either way, I don't care which, I personally would not want to run that ROM. I mean, he's either dishonest and that could open the door to all kinds of intentional badness being let loose in my phone, or he's incompetent, which could let loose all kinds of unintentional badness being let loose in my phone...
Thanks for the memories. Time for pizza and a beer.
Just basing off of the facts, namely the md5 matches of the apks, and BD's response, there really is only two possibilities. Either he blatantly stole the source (which has been stipulated by the aggrieved parties as not really being an offense if not for the insults thrown in with the theft) and continues to lie about it. Or he was incompetent to the point of not actually knowing what was going into the ROM, which I can't help but get the feeling is what he was saying in that statement.
Either way, I don't care which, I personally would not want to run that ROM. I mean, he's either dishonest and that could open the door to all kinds of intentional badness being let loose in my phone, or he's incompetent, which could let loose all kinds of unintentional badness being let loose in my phone...
Thanks for the memories. Time for pizza and a beer.