I would say neither .
lg suck when it come to android support and Sony is similar either delay update or no update. I say go with Samsung .
But, if you don't care about hipster devices and like stockish Ui. Then go with Motorola. Since the original droid RAZR they update frequently on their android devices and don't break their promises.
Since 2011- early 2012 flagship devices. Android 2.3.x to 4.1.2 is
Droid bionic
Droid 4
Droid razr
Droid maxx.
Original atrix from 2.2 os to 4.0 os
If you find the ICS leak.
By late April 2014
Android 4.0.4 os -4.4.x
Droid RAZR HD/Max hd
Droid m
Atrix HD
RAZR I
2012 Motorola flagship devices will be update with the exception of photon q.
Motorola suck with supporting their devices in 2011.
On this:
With devices like droid 3 didn't get no update came with gingerbread only.
With blur update and security one.
Droid x2 that was really an atrix without an front camera.
Came with 2.2 os and went to 2.3 os didn't update it should of had 2.3 os to start.
Atrix 2 came with 2.3 os stop getting support after 4.0.4 should of being updated to jelly bean at least.
But , If you want to be technical lg and Samsung are worst they have over 20 devices per year of different name and soc,GPU and CPU seem to update them once or Nada.
Lg is confused first g2 was their flagship. Now lg g2 flex and next their lg g pro 2.
Samsung with their galaxy s4 have different hardware in Europe and USA .
5 version of galaxy s iv:
http://m.cnet.com/news/the-five-different-galaxy-s4s-which-ones-for-you/57588926?ds=1
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk