I'll bite. What does that have to do with the topic???? ^^^^
because the OP mentioned he wanted to leave verizon for the Srint EVO and 4G
OK....It's not like you to just hijack a thread, I knew there had to be a reason.
I'll bite. What does that have to do with the topic???? ^^^^
because the OP mentioned he wanted to leave verizon for the Srint EVO and 4G
Just got back off a cruise last month to the caribbean. Before I left I called Verizon and explored the options. They told me that I could sign up for the international roaming plan (I think that is what its called) for 60.00 and they would cancel it when I got back and pro-rate it. Came out to like 15.00 for the week (me and my wife both did it so 30.00). The Ship I was on had a 1x tower that I was able to connect to while out to sea and each port of call had 3g (Mexico, Caymen Islands, Jamaica). With the data plan I bought I had no worries of that high bill.
Phone calls were still a per minute charge (like 2.99 per min on ship, much cheaper on shore though if an emergency happened) but data was all included.
for those planning on getting the EVO for 4G i hope you realize that sprint has less then 8% of their network on 4G and that coverage is only in 10 states.
Heres the states they do have coverage in and in most its only in 1 or 2 cities.
Georgia,
Hawaii,
Idaho
Illinois,
Maryland,
North Carolina,
Nevada,
Oregon,
Pennsylvania,
Texas,
Washington.
The FCC is accepting comments on this very subject right NOW. The 45 day period for this is ticking away. Whether or not you agree, make your voice heard!
The problem in this instance is that there probably still would not have been a notification from VZW about this usage. The usage was for data roaming on a cruise ship. It is entirely possible that the cruise line sent ONE bill to VZW at the END of the cruise for all data that was used during the cruise. How could VZW have even known that any data roaming was occurring?
Also - don't forget that VZW has REAL money in this particular situation, making any kind of a deal much harder for them to justify. No matter what they do for the OP, they still have to pay the cruise line the amount billed to them.
On a side note - VZW does occasionally send text messages regarding usage overages. I used to be on a pay as you go texting plan because I never texted. For a variety of reasons my texting activity went up. I got a text from VZW stating that I could save money if I got one of their texting plans and, if I got it before my billing cycle ended it would be retroactive.
You make a lot of good points. Good to see the voice of reason again.
If the cost for this type of data (from cruise ship) is immediately sent to Verizon, I still think it'd be easy for them set up text alerts. But you're right, there might be some technical hurdles. I would at least like the FCC to explore the feasibility/need for this.
I'm with you on the deal for the OP. I'm not calling for refunds. I just think it would be fair to alert a customer of unusual overages...just like a credit card company does, and how an auto shop must give an estimate. Carriers are abusing their power the way things are now.
I know they alert you to texting overages. I think they should do the same for other data. I think that the FCC needs to mandate this because if it's voluntary, they'll slip up and get off with "oops".
To critics I say it's not hand-holding, it's needed protection from powerful, abusive corporations.
To anyone who cares...
I finally made a call to Verizon again. After explaining exactly what happened (again), the CS agent completely understood and removed all charges, no questions asked.
This was the response I was hoping for to begin with and why I have been with Verizon for so long.
Let the hate begin...
It was a great ending. The way it should have ended. Good for you