My take on why Apple isn't adopting LTE is because of battery issues. If they would have added the dual core processor AND LTE then they wouldn't have any battery life in their new phone. The new phones like the Bionic are still using the same technology for their LTE radios as the TB is (I know they are different chips but same tech). I think Apple will adopt LTE later down the road possibly the iphone 5 for two reasons. 1) Second generation LTE radios will be more energy efficient 2) LTE will be more widespread than it is now. Just my thoughts.
Your girlfriend is lying to you.
Kidding.
On a more serious note, I would have to say, the Bionic is better.
They both have serious faults though and I'll explain.
With the Iphone 4s they failed to make the screen larger, even 3.7'' or 4'' would have been a great improvement. They failed to address the glass issue on the back, which is well known for cracking very easily. They also failed to think about LTE, which will be very prominent within the next 2 years(as it's widely used in all major cities already).
With the Bionic, the screen size is great, but the screen itself is lacking in quality, you can argue it, but the facts are there in plain sight. They could have used a nicer screen, they're available, but they chose not to. They also used cheaper materials for the chin of the device(painted plastic will chip) and the back of the device, which causes a large amount of them to creak because of poor choice in materials used.
Overall, the Bionic wins because screen size matters, LTE is becoming the norm as it's such an incredible improvement over 3G.
The Iphone 4S did a couple things Moto failed to do though, they improved their camera, making it even more superior. They improved antenna technology and used their most advance dual core chip.
I think the strangest thing about these phones are, both companies failed to correct issues that had occurred with previous devices, that could have easily been addressed and greatly improved both devices.
Moto failed to improve their screen quality and they went backwards in build quality.
Apple failed to increase their screen size and they didn't even address their build quality(glass) concerns.
No phone is perfect, we all know that, but I think that if those few things I mentioned would have been addressed by both Apple and Moto, we would have 2 much better devices to choose from.
I'm going to disagree here. What counts as a second generation radio? How will you really be able to tell? Besides the TB was developed with 2010 technology, the Bionic wasn't so they're in different areas. Battery life will be something that comes gradually, not because of a "second generation" lte radio.
My thoughts are similar to yours. Apple is trying to develop their own lte technology while keeping battery life higher than current phones and because they know more of the market will have LTE. They're Apple, they don't need to be early to the 4g game. They know people will buy their products regardless so right now they're just trying to perfect it the best they can.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using DroidForums
Well in that case I agree. I just wouldn't call it second generation because I don't think we'll be able to tell. Things like this are just going to take time. Time for the network to grow, time for the technology to be mastered, time for the technology to be produced and given. Like I said, Apple is Apple so they don't need to be the first to the game. They can take their time and develop their tech because they know millions of people will always buy an iPhone because it's an iPhone.When I say "second generation" I don't mean as if we were talking about the 2nd gen ipod touch. All Im saying is Apple won't adopt LTE til the technology allows good battery life while using LTE. I guess I just call it second gen cuz the biggest draw back to LTE is the battery life and once that gets worked out it would be "second gen".
One of the pluses of 4G Verizon phones ... is that for the 1st time on Verizon ... you can NOW do talking and browsing at the same time ... thus my reason for doing the Bionic and NOT The 4S.
It is nice to be able to do both ... something AT&T has been allowing for quite some time ... though AT&T's overall coverage sucks ... when compared to Verizon ... so what if you can do both at the same time ... but half of the time you got NO signal at all ... lol
Peace
My son called the other day. He asked me to open the link he had sent to my email. I put the speaker phone on, opened the email, clicked the link and played the video he wanted me to see. The 4 minute video also had sound. While viewing and listening to the video l was talking to my son the whole time. I was impressed, and that was on my Droid X.
Sent from my DROIDX using DroidForums
My son called the other day. He asked me to open the link he had sent to my email. I put the speaker phone on, opened the email, clicked the link and played the video he wanted me to see. The 4 minute video also had sound. While viewing and listening to the video l was talking to my son the whole time. I was impressed, and that was on my Droid X.
Sent from my DROIDX using DroidForums
My take on why Apple isn't adopting LTE is because of battery issues. If they would have added the dual core processor AND LTE then they wouldn't have any battery life in their new phone. The new phones like the Bionic are still using the same technology for their LTE radios as the TB is (I know they are different chips but same tech). I think Apple will adopt LTE later down the road possibly the iphone 5 for two reasons. 1) Second generation LTE radios will be more energy efficient 2) LTE will be more widespread than it is now. Just my thoughts.
who do u guys think will win