If I bought a car that was rated at 28MPG, I would view that claim with skepticism. That's because there's too many variables that go into that calculation, and it's all marketing when you boil it down:
- What grade of gas did they use? Yes, this matters.
- Did they test in mountain regions? Flat road? Dirt road? Snow? Rain? Full traffic? Imperfect (i.e. cracked, pothole) road? Curved roads? Speed bumps? Stop lights? Stop signs? Or did they test on a perfectly smooth, flat road that they created for an optimized testing scenario?
- What was the temperature when they tested? Yes, this matters.
- What tires were used when they tested? What was their inflation amount? Were they all inflated the same?
- Did they test with the windows up? Windows down? Sunroof open/closed? Rear windows up/down?
- Did they test with a bunch of luggage or other weight-added items to test drag coefficient?
- Did they test with a clean car vs. a dirty one (MythBusters)?
My car is rated such, and I realistically can get 20-23MPG under normal circumstances. My point here is that testing and rated efficiency is always based on controlled conditions and should be used as a guide, not a guarantee. Same with laptop batteries, same with anything else that has a finite life span.
Any consumer who buys a device and sees some number and doesn't understand that "Their Mileage May Vary" has no business buying a phone like this, and I would also submit that Verizon is part to blame for pushing sales without emphasizing the simple fact that it's all about the individual use case. But regardless of forums like this, some things should just be common sense.
On a side note, over WiFi only for the past 30 minutes, with screen timeout disabled and doing large, back-to-back downloads over WiFi (200MB download of the same package, XP Service Pack 2), which except for calls replicates a "heavy user", my estimate actually increased to 62 hours. I even bumped up the brightness to to try and see if Display would skyrocket; it didn't. At this point I'm 99% convinced that the 3G/4G radio chip is the least efficient part of the phone, and if people just simply work over Wi-Fi they will see some rather significant improvements. Call duration is the only test I haven't done, and I'm sure call duration will kill battery just because it does on every phone.
There was one, a year or so ago, but it never worked properly. It only was designed for 3G. I forgot its name.
I have always wanted a one-button toggle that let me set profiles for "Home", "Work" and "Field".
Home will enable Wi-Fi only. No Bluetooth, no 3G, no 4G. I'd use this also if I were in some hotel that had free Wi-Fi, or if I were using my Mobile Hotspot instead.
Work will enable 4G and Bluetooth. No Wi-Fi. We have Wi-Fi at work but it's dialup speed and I can't get anything done.
Field will enable 3G only. Rarely do I need 4G when I'm driving somewhere, and I use my other device for Bluetooth audio because it has better quality.
I've actually gotten tempted to just learn how to write it myself. It's frustrating, because if I could have such an app I think it would go a long way towards power management for this and other phones...for those that are willing, that is.