is it so bad to subtly advertise something you buy, and therefore want or need, and therefore support with your purchase? :icon_eek:
I find it interesting to note that the people who have no issue with this are also the ones that can't be bothered to quote effectively and cleanly.
And yes, the point is that the companies have, as I noted, gotten people to find this sort of thing entirely acceptable to the point of having made much of it into an actual fashion statement or status statement. Again, as someone in marketing the brilliance of it isn't lost on me. That so many people have come to accept it all is just sheer corporate wonder.
They thank you. The rest of us not caring for their advertising at every turn do not.
Again, you PAID TapaTalk. That's the ultimate form of support for them. They pay for advertising elsewhere and I opt to turn it off where I can. I also am a customer of theirs and our relationship with regard to my supporting them begins and ends with my payment with the exception of recommendations to others. Your spamming everyone else just makes you a shill in my view. Sorry.
Corporations are there to make money for their shareholders - I hate to break it to you. One way they do that is by garnering support for their products. People buy those products. People use those products, and yes, by using the product, it is free advertising. Do you cover up coke cans when you drink them in public? If not, then you're falling into your own description. Your "shill" generalization is flat out silly and unfair. Do people abuse signatures? Sure - but that's their right, it's their signature. You can turn off signatures in the df.net settings.