The bolded portion is my favorite part. Also, I'm getting a good laugh from the people defending Apple on this one when they clearly have no leg to stand on. My favorite defense is the icon argument. I'm sure Samsung is the only vendor that uses a phone image for the phone icon.
I don't think you understand the what trade dress infringement is, or are aware that Apple has used it successfully in the past to more or less remove products from the market (see the eMachines reference in the article I linked.)
I've got a Captivate (and an iPhone 4, which is now relegated to an Alarm Clock docked to an iHome radio), and the stock Touchwiz is very iPhone-ish. Whether you agree to or not, the fact is trade dress is considered a form of intellectual property protected under the Lanham Act. Apple isn't trying to claim that they own the concept of the phone icon representing the phone, but rather that Samsung's implementation was done intentionally to mimic the iPhone's trade dress.
Why is the Samsung icon green with a white background and showing the phone titled in an angle similar to the iPhone's (which is trademarked)? Why did they use a gear like the iPhone icon instead of say, a wrench or a screwdriver, or a wrench and hammer criss-crossed? Google "settings icon" and there are plenty of alternatives to the gear. Why does the gallery icon (which is a stock Android icon, and thus probably explains why the Nexus S is included) have a flower on it? Couldn't a picture frame do just as well? Why does the Touchwiz launcher use dot indicators located at the top of the screen to show the current screen? The music player is undeniably a thinly veiled attempt to mimic the iTunes icon. Only a Samsung apologist would argue otherwise.
As for the patent portion of the lawsuit: nobody here is a patent lawyer, but we can all see and have seen some of the ridiculous patents granted by the PTO. At this point, any affirmation or dismissal of the legitimacy of the patent portion of the lawsuit is purely conjecture. But any objective observer can see that Apple has a legitimate case for trade dress infringement.