The Apple picture reminds me of the way pictures used to come out on Canon digital cameras: highly over-saturated. The Bionic pic is perhaps a bit underexposed but the colors are far more true to life. I don't have a dog in this fight, so just giving it to you from the perspective of someone who's worked in photography and prefers realistic tones.
This is true. The IPhone pictures look great and vivid because it's kind of like an enhanced digital photo. Is a vibrant picture that "pops" more than the real thing bad? I don't know, visually it's more appealing but then you have the debate with purists saying it's not a real/true picture. "Bad" in that instance is a matter of preference and perspective.