What will be interesting is there's a lot of resistance here [this forum] from paying more for LTE. The big question is are the people here representative?
No -- this forum is not representative of the majority of users.
The subject of Tiered pricing generally receives a much more mixed reaction because -- depending on your perspective -- it's not always a bad thing.
For arguments sake, let's create a
fictional Tiered pricing plan for LTE:
- $15 / month - 250mb data cap (LTE)
- $30 / month - 2gb data cap (LTE)
- $50 / month - Unlimited data (LTE)
If we compare this plan to the existing $30 / month Unlimited data plan, then the only people negatively impacted by this change are those that exceed 2gb of usage per month.
If you use less than that, there is no change or it can even be BENEFICIAL if your usage is so low that you can drop down to a 250mb plan.
A lot of people prefer Tiered pricing because they see it as buying "a la carte" where they can customize the plan based on their own usage. This is seen as preferable to "buffet" pricing where low usage users pay the same price as the high usage consumers.
On a forum like this -- where most people are likely high usage consumers -- the Tiered pricing is viewed as a severe negative because they will need to pay more if they continue consuming at that level.
There is also a third group (of which I'm included) that simply doesn't like Tiered pricing because they fear overage charges. I don't want to closely "monitor" my data usage for fear of going over. So even though I may never get anywhere near my "cap" -- I prefer the Unlimited style plans.
From Verizon's perspective, Tiered pricing can maximize profits. It can entice flip-phone users into into trying the new smartphones by offering an entry level data plan. It can also charge overages. It can also get people to pay based on usage, discouraging abuse.