Martin030908
Super Moderator
Here's the link for myLock.
Here's the link for myLock.
Haven't read carefully through this whole thread but it appears that no one has mentioned "ScreenModeWidget" available in the Market. Has two options in addition to the default behavior.
() Allows the screen to shut off but pressing the power button bypasses the lock screen.
() Keeps the screen on all the time.
I've had it on my Droid for several months and though I don't use it often it appears to work as advertised.
P.S. It's free.
Haven't read carefully through this whole thread but it appears that no one has mentioned "ScreenModeWidget" available in the Market. Has two options in addition to the default behavior.
() Allows the screen to shut off but pressing the power button bypasses the lock screen.
() Keeps the screen on all the time.
I've had it on my Droid for several months and though I don't use it often it appears to work as advertised.
P.S. It's free.
It's been mentioned. Read back.
It's slightly quirky, but usually it changes modes by itself and all you have to do is touch the widget to set to AWAKE STAY, and it's good to go again.
For what it's worth, for those of you criticizing the poster who said the mandated lock feature is really stupid, I agree with the poster. It's a huge pain in the ass to have to undergo two actions just to view your "computer". (I don't view this as a phone anymore, even though that's one of its many functions. It's a handheld computer to me). And both are awkward.
Now that I've installed Screen Mode Widget, I love just having to hit that camera button to turn it on. That, to me, is ergonomically placed for vertical or horizontal use. The way it should be. (And no, I don't have accidental dials in my pocket. And even if I did, I'd rather have those than the lock screen. Why aren't there options?)
Another example of utter incompetence at Motorola. They had no competition so they let the focus group and product testing procedures slide. Thankfully developers have worked hard to correct numerous Moto gaffes. HTC and others will have their way with Motorola if this continues. I think their new scaled down device serves absolutely no purpose. They'd have better just focused on the little but very important and commonly used features. No excuse for making a screen lock mandatory.
Fine - they both suck, especially for version 2. It's a phone first, not a search engine.Another example of utter incompetence at Motorola. They had no competition so they let the focus group and product testing procedures slide. Thankfully developers have worked hard to correct numerous Moto gaffes. HTC and others will have their way with Motorola if this continues. I think their new scaled down device serves absolutely no purpose. They'd have better just focused on the little but very important and commonly used features. No excuse for making a screen lock mandatory.
If you're going to start blaming companies for this, at least blame the right one. Motorola didn't implement the required lock and two-step unlock - Google did. Android doesn't straight-up support sleep without lock. Android phones all require two steps - a button push to wake up the screen, and then a slide unlock. In fact, I don't think I've ever owned a phone that didn't require at least two steps to unlock (without an app or hack to change it). My wife's Eris requires two steps to unlock it, and I find the button at the bottom front of the phone to be more awkward than the Droid's at the top.
If you want to gripe about Moto's button placement, that's fine. I personally don't have a problem with it, and don't have trouble using the phone one-handed. They didn't have room to put it on the front of the phone (like HTC usually does), and putting it on the top left would have made it inoperable when in the multimedia dock. I think they put quite a bit of effort/testing into it actually. It may not be the way you want it, but that's why there are 100's of phones on the market.
Fine - they both suck, especially for version 2. It's a phone first, not a search engine.
Fine - they both suck, especially for version 2. It's a phone first, not a search engine.
Fine - they both suck, especially for version 2. It's a phone first, not a search engine.
I disagree wholeheartedly with that. If you want just a phone, anything will do.
The Droid is a handheld computer first which happens to have a phone.
I think they will cease calling handheld devices like these "phones" --or "smartphones" -- at some point.