You must be blind.
Sent from my Incredible 2
I have 20/20 Vision... I am sorry but I do not hold the phone at the tip of my nose.. And I am the kind of person that if a pixel is out I will return the phone..
You must be blind.
Sent from my Incredible 2
are you saying there isn't any pixelation??? the fact is, it's there. the SAMOLED has a lot of color saturation. it's there.
the question comes down to whether or not it's acceptable to YOU. if you find it acceptable, great. if others don't, that's fine, too. it comes down to a question of personal preferences, tolerances, and opinions - and since it's a personal choice there is no right or wrong answer. period.
Everyone's going to have different tolerances for what they think is a good screen. I'm huge into quality screens, I can't even use a computer screen if it's not an IPS panel because lower quality ones drive me nuts. Viewing angles, color banding, pixelation ect...
My cousin said he thought the D3's screen looked good, but when I went to test it I thought the colors were very drab and there was slight pixelation, but more like the colors just didn't pop.
The DX2's screen is pretty bad as well, it's better than the X's terrible screen, but I'm hoping they've improved the X2's screen for the Bionic.
To me the screen is one of the most important things when deciding on a phone, it's how you do anything on the phone other than phone calls themselves.
Quality hardware and Motorola go hand in hand, where they lack is screen quality.
I checked out the D3 2 weeks back and the screen was definitely a let down. I wouldn't say pixelation as much as poor colors.
I think we worry way too much about the little things on here. The average consumer probably won't notice or won't care. I've watched people at the Verizon store by my look at the D3 and X2. They didn't have any questions about the display or even noticed anything wrong. The rep just say it was a high resolution screen, the X2 had a larger one without a keyboard, and the D3 was smaller without the keyboard. Those were his selling points.
I disagree.
If the average consumer didn't care about screen quality, then stores wouldn't crank up saturation/brightness settings on flat screens to grab their attention. The screen is the window into what a device can do.
As long as they keep the consumer ignorant, the greater chance they'll be unhappy with their device and I think that's a moral failure.
Just because it's a practice embraced by a company, doesn't mean it's right.