Darkseider
Senior Member
Do you really own your phone, or are you just renting it?
Easy. Rent. If you stop making monthly payments it will stop working.
You rent Verizons service. The phone itself can still be used as a glorified PMP without cell service. So how is it that Motorola's or Verizon's terms still apply? What if I bought the phone outright and wanted it solely as a PMP and to use on wifi? How would Motorola or Verizon justify the decision made to lock down the bootloader then? I really do think this whole locked bootloader thing may end up in court because of consumer rights and rights to property ownership. If I pay for a product it is mine to do with as I see fit. If by doing that I void a warranty so be it. It is my choice to make as the owner of the product not the manufacturers. They have the right to deny me warranty service based on these modifications but in no way should they be able to restrict me from making them.
EDIT: I don't like this one bit. The precedent being set by Motorola in this decision may have lasting repercussions to not only their products but other manufacturers. This cannot and should not be tolerated on any level. The fact that consumers, even informed ones, knowingly support this corporate behavior is disheartening.
Last edited: