-1 opinions. or valuing quality. or being honest.
i like the "hate" and "negitivity" thrown on someone as soon as they disagree or point out some flaws. i genuinely am confused about this rom. i see more features on roms like cm6 that are about a half a year old. yet i see people really enjoying it. maybe i was missing something?
oh well, i guess i'll just crawl back into my troll hole and remember that criticism of any kind can/will not be tolerated and more importantly never leads to progress.
Actually, this was the most useful post of all your ramblings. You actually provided some real detail. Everything prior to this post was simply inflammatory for no good reason. If you cannot figure out the difference between the two approaches then it's best you just stop taking part in online dialogs.
Trust me, I'm new to this thread but I can guarantee you that I can be critical without being insulting:
I think the LED notification issue should get a higher priority as given it's visibility in partially working it can be annoying that it's not fully addressed yet.
See? That's an example of a constructive criticism. I provided detail. I provided context and reasoning. That helps the developers. It helps the readers understand the perspective and it does so without being a jackass.
It's a real shame people don't need to earn the right to post online.