- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- Messages
- 7,633
- Reaction score
- 4,122
I work in a retail setting and deal with many customers who use our website on a desktop/laptop then use their phones in store for verification or looking products up on our site. What I inevitably see is most have a Samsung device or iPhone. Most have nothing changed from how it was set up from the box. Many don't know how to check their email that they got stating their product is in or ready to be picked up if it was a "guest fulfill order" that I need the order number to put into our system so I can get their product to them from our backroom.
What costumers that I deal with seem to want in a phone is a good camera, one like their buddies have got and it look good in their case of choice. Then the other extreme is the cheapest one available on their pre pay network and a loud speakerphone . Those still have the same non tech savvy mindset in the least, or any desire to do so.
Most of my coworkers are pretty much the same, with their carrier seeming to take highest priority because they're either college students or more married to the company than the location of it they currently work at. I only work with, or have worked with 1 person that keeps up with all this stuff and he only does so to compare to his ios devices.
When I see folks in stores I'm in using their devices I see the same basic patterns. When I talk to people in general if the topic of a device comes up I am the one that initiates it and if we get as far as showing them mine they go cross eyed when they see I have a non stock launcher. One guy that repairs phones for a living saw my launcher and said "that's too complicated" when he saw it has more than 1 dock.
The Nexus lineup doesn't have anything special to offer those I mentioned above so there's no reason for them to want to change from the status quo they currently maintain. They are pretty much brand or price loyal only. I think this is why Verizon took a stab at the Gnex, for those loyal to a carrier more than a phone and those loyal to Samsung more than what it had to offer. When those that ended up buying the device were dissatisfied with how it was handled and its lack of quality Verizon abandoned it and the idea of selling anything Nexus just like they threw Windows Mobile out the window within minutes of releasing the Omnia 2, possibly seeing the writing on the wall of its soon demise before the general public did.
An ad blitz will be the only thing that, should Google decide they want mainstream devices, that will sway the average sheep away from the current line of rationale. I just don't see Google wanting a device that will be a top seller. The revenue outlay would be tremendous and totally unlike their usual marketing strategies of software and application/programs being the cash cow. Seeing Amazon work with its devices as revenue enhancers is a model nobody else outside of Apple seems to want to go for. The iPod was a cash cow more for iTunes than player sales. The iPhone brought in billions more in app sales. The iPad, continued that trend. With Google having its media platform available on many current manufacturers and users of its operating system it wouldn't really make sense, business wise, to spend big bucks on hardware just to become more prevalent in a device saturated market. Apple got in on the ground floor. Google chose to let others do the hardware and make a higher net on the software end.
Support Our Troops!!!
Beast Mode 4
<><
What costumers that I deal with seem to want in a phone is a good camera, one like their buddies have got and it look good in their case of choice. Then the other extreme is the cheapest one available on their pre pay network and a loud speakerphone . Those still have the same non tech savvy mindset in the least, or any desire to do so.
Most of my coworkers are pretty much the same, with their carrier seeming to take highest priority because they're either college students or more married to the company than the location of it they currently work at. I only work with, or have worked with 1 person that keeps up with all this stuff and he only does so to compare to his ios devices.
When I see folks in stores I'm in using their devices I see the same basic patterns. When I talk to people in general if the topic of a device comes up I am the one that initiates it and if we get as far as showing them mine they go cross eyed when they see I have a non stock launcher. One guy that repairs phones for a living saw my launcher and said "that's too complicated" when he saw it has more than 1 dock.
The Nexus lineup doesn't have anything special to offer those I mentioned above so there's no reason for them to want to change from the status quo they currently maintain. They are pretty much brand or price loyal only. I think this is why Verizon took a stab at the Gnex, for those loyal to a carrier more than a phone and those loyal to Samsung more than what it had to offer. When those that ended up buying the device were dissatisfied with how it was handled and its lack of quality Verizon abandoned it and the idea of selling anything Nexus just like they threw Windows Mobile out the window within minutes of releasing the Omnia 2, possibly seeing the writing on the wall of its soon demise before the general public did.
An ad blitz will be the only thing that, should Google decide they want mainstream devices, that will sway the average sheep away from the current line of rationale. I just don't see Google wanting a device that will be a top seller. The revenue outlay would be tremendous and totally unlike their usual marketing strategies of software and application/programs being the cash cow. Seeing Amazon work with its devices as revenue enhancers is a model nobody else outside of Apple seems to want to go for. The iPod was a cash cow more for iTunes than player sales. The iPhone brought in billions more in app sales. The iPad, continued that trend. With Google having its media platform available on many current manufacturers and users of its operating system it wouldn't really make sense, business wise, to spend big bucks on hardware just to become more prevalent in a device saturated market. Apple got in on the ground floor. Google chose to let others do the hardware and make a higher net on the software end.
Support Our Troops!!!
Beast Mode 4
<><