Was out running some errands and stopped by my local Verizon store. They had a demo LG2 on the charger and they pulled it off so I could check it out. The phone had kind of a gun metal back with a blueish hue to it when the light hit it just right. Looked good. Verizon branding was very low profile, if any at all. I don't remember seeing any big Verizon signage on the phone but I really wasn't looking for it.
The phone felt very comfortable in my hands with a slight curve on the back, sort of like the HTC One but with a flatter radius. The screen looked fantastic and the switching between screens and apps was very smooth. The Verizon add-on apps appeared fairly minimal. Settings told me that 24gb out of 32gb was available (IIRC) and there were a couple of hefty media demo files on the device.
The buttons on the back did not bother me. I have a feeling that if I used the phone regularly it would seem natural. The double-knock on the screen to wake the phone up and put it in standby worked great. Also, this is a global phone.
I really liked this phone and it seems like it could a a contender to replace my Galaxy Nexus. That said, I would be remiss to not wait to see what happens with Nexus 5, especially in light of the article I just read that indicated it is based on the G2 platform and that Google / LG MIGHT be adapting the phone for the Verizon network......the combination of Nexus and LG2 could be ideal!!
That is all!
I thought about that but then all the G2 specific features would be gone.
I THINK that LG will update the G2 at least once in the next year or 2. That's good enough for me.
Everyone's at arms over the update schedule on previous LG phones. Before, I agree, that mattered because updates for android were big news, huge feature packs. But now it doesn't. We've been on the same major version of android since October 2011. We know the next update is quite minor, and the one after that might be just the same. So I don't really get the whole update argument anymore. The phone performance is flawless, battery life is great, who needs that next gimmicky feature that bad?
Samsung had that rep about updates at first and they improved. I think lg will as well.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
I think they might as well but even if they don't, what damage is really done? Android is smooth as whipped cream, not having the latest version is no longer the disadvantage it was. Being behind before meant a lagging device riddled with bugs and only love from the few developers that supported it.
I suspect you are using the term "lagging" to mean "being behind." However system lag that develops over time has been an issue with Android.
Everyone's at arms over the update schedule on previous LG phones. Before, I agree, that mattered because updates for android were big news, huge feature packs. But now it doesn't. We've been on the same major version of android since October 2011. We know the next update is quite minor, and the one after that might be just the same. So I don't really get the whole update argument anymore. The phone performance is flawless, battery life is great, who needs that next gimmicky feature that bad?
Tried to play with the one at my local VZW store last night... they had it all hooked up so it was hard to feel if the buttons would work or not, but they felt somewhat hard to "read" by my fingers. The back was horribly greasy as well - as bad or worse than the S4's grease-grabbing plastic.
However, the device itself felt incredibly solid and for the 3 seconds I could get the phone to stay on, the screen was absolutely gorgeous. They had it plugged into a usb cable that the phone didn't like, so the battery was dead. Clearly they didn't care that the phone was released... it was at the end of the Samsung table, laying on its side, plugged into a separate usb "station" (possibly in an attempt to get it to charge up). No signs or anything anywhere about the phone being released. Too bad... a little marketing would go a long way for that phone.