Wireless Moot

[SamuriHL]

Guys, doesn't matter what he has installed. The HoB uses its internal adb in the utils dir.

 

[Dave12308]

adb is in the HoB utils dir. Your install is messed up if it's not finding it.

Yeah, that's gotta be it, forgot you were specifically referencing %UTILS% in the script *LOL*

 

[Dave12308]

Guys, doesn't matter what he has installed. The HoB uses its internal adb in the utils dir.

Realized that after I posted *LOL* Let me see if I can delete my post.

 

[sargentmajord]

Realized that after I posted *LOL* Let me see if I can delete my post.

Same here lmao xD

 

[SamuriHL]

Yeah, that's gotta be it, forgot you were specifically referencing %UTILS% in the script *LOL*

You of all people should know that at this point.

 

[Captain Crypto]

adb is in the HoB utils dir. Your install is messed up if it's not finding it.

I'm looking in the utils directory right now. adb is not in there. The only things in there are 7za.exe, CDTParser, exe, fciv.exe, and sa-md5sum. I just re-ran the 7.0 installer and adb is still not in there.

And as Dave said, it makes no sense that adb is not running because it is actually installed. I can run adb at the command line from the root, from /users/xxx, etc. I don't understand why adb is not being installed in the utils directory.

Any ideas?

 

[Dave12308]

You of all people should know that at this point.

LMAO - I use HoB quite a bit, but only look at the code from time to time. I should know better though, if there's any way to avoid an ID-10-T error, it's probably coded into the HoB by now.

 

[SamuriHL]

I'm looking in the utils directory right now. adb is not in there. The only things in there are 7za.exe, CDTParser, exe, fciv.exe, and sa-md5sum. I just re-ran the 7.0 installer and adb is still not in there.

And as Dave said, it makes no sense that adb is not running because it is actually installed. I can run adb at the command line from the root, from /users/xxx, etc. I don't understand why adb is not being installed in the utils directory.

Any ideas?

You're joking right? How about update to 7.2.

 

[SamuriHL]

LMAO - I use HoB quite a bit, but only look at the code from time to time. I should know better though, if there's any way to avoid an ID-10-T error, it's probably coded into the HoB by now.

I've certainly tried...

 

[Captain Crypto]

You're joking right? How about update to 7.2.

I swear to you I am not joking. I downloaded each file from your HoB thread, checked to make sure I downloaded each one, and ran the executables.

Ah! I just installed 7.2 and adb is in there. I have no idea why it didn't install with 7.0, but there it is. Starting the install process now...

 

[Dave12308]

I'm looking in the utils directory right now. adb is not in there. The only things in there are 7za.exe, CDTParser, exe, fciv.exe, and sa-md5sum. I just re-ran the 7.0 installer and adb is still not in there.

And as Dave said, it makes no sense that adb is not running because it is actually installed. I can run adb at the command line from the root, from /users/xxx, etc. I don't understand why adb is not being installed in the utils directory.

Any ideas?

Actually, it does make sense if you look at the batch file. It sets up a variable called %UTILS% and the ADB command is explicitly referenced to run from that exact location. So in this case, it doesn't care that you have the SDK installed and adb is in your path statement.

Sort of like if I am trying to run "C:\files\runme.bat" it's not going to run "C:\otherfiles\runme.bat" - even if I have "C:\otherfiles\runme.bat" in my path, it's still going to give an error if I try running "C:\files\runme.bat" and that particular "runme.bat" file doesn't exist. A direct path reference always overrides the PATH environment variable.

 

[SamuriHL]

I swear to you I am not joking. I downloaded each file from your HoB thread, checked to make sure I downloaded each one, and ran the executables.

Ah! I just installed 7.2 and adb is in there. I have no idea why it didn't install with 7.0, but there it is. Starting the install process now...

Because 7.0 didn't include it.

 

[SamuriHL]

Actually, it does make sense if you look at the batch file. It sets up a variable called %UTILS% and the ADB command is explicitly referenced to run from that exact location. So in this case, it doesn't care that you have the SDK installed and adb is in your path statement.

Sort of like if I am trying to run "C:\files\runme.bat" it's not going to run "C:\otherfiles\runme.bat" - even if I have "C:\otherfiles\runme.bat" in my path, it's still going to give an error if I try running "C:\files\runme.bat" and that particular "runme.bat" file doesn't exist. A direct path reference always overrides the PATH environment variable.

I made this change for the reason that I can control exactly what's used. I know what versions they are and there's no outside interference.

 

[Dave12308]

I made this change for the reason that I can control exactly what's used. I know what versions they are and there's no outside interference.

I guess that's the mark of a genius mind right there. You're always thinking!

 

[sargentmajord]

I guess that's the mark of a genius mind right there. You're always thinking!

I am the only genius here