I was reading an article on this and looking at the responses the author got.
One analogy is that the data plans should be alike the water company. You pay for consumption either on a per gallon basis, or in a tiered usage plan.
But to pay the top price for "unlimited" water, but to then be told that you can only use that water for drinking and watering the lawn, not for showers, that if you want to use water for bathing, you have to have a separate water plan at an extra fee, etc...
That is how things should be done. I know, we all signed the ToS knowing the deal, we have covered all of that. Philosophically I am opposed to the way they do things. It's price gouging. Data is data. Our voice is digital, it is data. But we pay two prices, one for voice data, one for data data. Then we have a price for text/MMS data. Then they want to charge us for tether data.
When does it end? I understand the desire and NEED to earn a profit. But at what point have you nickled and dimed your customers enough?
When you look at the price of unlimited voice, and unlimited texts, and unlimited data, and you use a fraction of each of them. It doesn't cost Verizon anything for you to tether, unless your CONSUMPTION goes up as a result. Then you may be costing them money. You are soaking up tons of bandwidth, and if enough people on your node do it, other users suffer performance losses. Maybe VZW has to upgrade that node to handle the capacity and that is expensive.
But that is an issue of excessive consumption, not tethering per se. What if I plug my phone into the HDMI port of my home theater and stream video all day and chew up 75GB a month? Then I am creating the same problem but tethering was not involved.
Set aside this ToS stuff for now. I am arguing what is fair and what makes sense, and I think that how they do things is crappy. If I tether or use so much data on the phone itself where I am actually costing them money, they I should be capped or forced to pay more. Just as if I wanted to use my city water line to fill my swimming pool. I gotta pay extra for all that water.
But if I only use a small amount of water, through all uses combined, is it fair to charge me a fee for each TYPE of way that I use my water?
Does my tethering and still only managing to use 200mb a month in data on an unlimited plan COST Verizon money? No. It doesn't. It is a situation where, by the rules and artificial features that they created, that they may not "make as much money as they want to make", but I didn't actually cost them any money, nor did I do anything that forced them to incur any direct costs.
There is a difference, ethically I feel.
Charge me for what I use, that's what I want. If I pay for 2GB of "water", let me decide if I want to drink it, take a shower or water my flower bed with that water. If I go over because I got silly with it, then charge me, but so long as I stay under my tier, just leave me alone already.
Or does that make too much sense? LOL