Using Microsoft is further proof that you don't know what you're talking about. Computers cannot generally run without windows or it's tied in products. That's why there have been so many anti-trust suits against the company.
Now imagine Swype trying to get a meeting with Verizon. The Verizon exec is going to ask a simple question - "don't we provide a keyboard?" and of course the answer is yes..
Then the question will be "will including swype increase the number of units we sell?" and the answer will be NO. They will ask if the average person on the street even knows what swype is and the answer will be that 95% of people DONT know.
So the Verizon management will then say "let them put it in the marketplace".
Here is another version - They meet with Swype and love the product. They think it could be a great method to advertise their phones and get a few more customers. They ask Swype how much per unit and Swype says $2. After the room full of Verizon people stop laughing their asses off they ask if Swype is serious. Then they offer Swype .10 per installed copy.
Now what's the better model - .10 per copy or $5 to $10 on the market?
At $2 per licensed copy and at 2M + Droids if they had included Swype it so far would have cost them over 4 Million just to add a feature most people don't know about and won't use.
The cell phone companies DO NOT add third party software unless it will sell more phones and unless it's dirt cheap.
You need to learn more about how business works my man.
Now imagine Swype trying to get a meeting with Verizon. The Verizon exec is going to ask a simple question - "don't we provide a keyboard?" and of course the answer is yes..
Then the question will be "will including swype increase the number of units we sell?" and the answer will be NO. They will ask if the average person on the street even knows what swype is and the answer will be that 95% of people DONT know.
So the Verizon management will then say "let them put it in the marketplace".
Here is another version - They meet with Swype and love the product. They think it could be a great method to advertise their phones and get a few more customers. They ask Swype how much per unit and Swype says $2. After the room full of Verizon people stop laughing their asses off they ask if Swype is serious. Then they offer Swype .10 per installed copy.
Now what's the better model - .10 per copy or $5 to $10 on the market?
At $2 per licensed copy and at 2M + Droids if they had included Swype it so far would have cost them over 4 Million just to add a feature most people don't know about and won't use.
The cell phone companies DO NOT add third party software unless it will sell more phones and unless it's dirt cheap.
You need to learn more about how business works my man.
I completely disagree.
Just like every app on the marketplace it will get updated as they improve it and get the bugs out.
If they did a deal and had it as OEM they would have exactly the same cost of customer service.
It would be absolutely stupid not to offer it for $5 to Droid and Nexus One users considering there is no way they are going to get money from those devices any other way.
I'm amazed at the lack of business sense here.
Really? Perhaps you should share your "business sense" with Microsoft. That's a company that managed to become the most successful software business in history by selling the bulk of its software to manufacturers, not end users. Of course, Microsoft does provide end-user support for its software. Checked the price of that support lately?
Further, you might want to check to see how much "customer support" Swype provides to users of their software on the devices they support. Zilch. Support on the Ominia II, for example, is provided by Samsung, the phone manufacturer.
The bottom line is that there is a vast difference between a relatively simple standalone software application for a niche market, a description that fits about 99% of the apps in the Android Market, and software that is essential to the operation of a particular device such as a virtual keyboard. I can get along just fine if my particular music player is buggy. If my keyboard doesn't work as intended I can't use almost any application on my phone.
Swype may, of course, opt to make their software to end users. But if they do, the model they're likely to use is demonstrated by their beta program where they can control the individual devices and users that download the software. Not the free for all Android market where such controls are marginal at best.