RE: the $18K cell phone case/bill...
A few of the articles mention a "2yr free promo" had expired. I've never heard of of such a promo. But I'm wondering if it was due to the change from 1xRTT phones to EVDO phones? That was about the 2006 time frame.
Back then, the Verizon Mobile office kits included some form of tethering for 1xRTT phones (like V710, T720/T730), but then with the launch of EVDO phones tethering was against TOS unless you paid for the broadband feature... Maybe this customer switched from a 1xRTT where tethering was "free" to an EVDO phone where it wasn't (was billed per minute), it was against the TOS, and therefore racked up the big bill?
As for citing examples of Cell Phone, Past Technology, or other devices like BB users, all which have a same/similar clause in their TOS... It does illustrate a precedent. VZW did come after people for tethering against TOS before, on other devices, so is certainly possible VZW will come after Droid users.
I'll agree that the debate can/will rage on about if they are or are not actively pursuing and catching Droid users who tether against their TOS. And some wont be satisfied until a Droid user who was caught actually comes forward and posts a copy of his/her bill. (The debate about cell phone users tethering went on for over a year and 1000+ posts at ->
HowardForums: Your Mobile Phone Community & Resource - EVDO Tethering (Discuss in this Thread Only!) )
But technically, tethering without an add-on plan is against VZW's written and posted ToS and if chosen, they could enforce.
In other words, violate the written TOS if you want, but if VZW does take notice and catches you then just be prepared to deal with it, whatever the consequences may be.
Knowing this information, if you want to feel safe because no Droid has posted proof of getting caught, that is your choice.