Seriously. I don't know where this so-called disappointment came from. The things some people complain about in this thread make me facepalm. Have fun holding out for the next latest and greatest phone.
DroidForums.net | Android Forum & News
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The Disappointment Thread
- Thread starter Briankbl
- Start date
Seriously. I don't know where this so-called disappointment came from. The things some people complain about in this thread make me facepalm. Have fun holding out for the next latest and greatest phone.
Take a 5mp photo and an 8mp photo and enlarge them and you will see the difference with the extra graciousness. If you don't print out photos or show them on a big screen, then that camera should be fine. For people like me that do those types of things, it may not be good enough.
That's wrong, if you take all of the same internals and increase the megapixels from 5 to 8 you will have pix with much sharper detail, especially if they are enlarged or shown on a tv. You can say a little extra detail doesn't matter to you but don't say there's no difference between 5 and 8mp.
PS-I totally agree that the zero shutter lag is awesome.
99% of the time then I need my SLR, it's at home in the closest. For Vacations it's great, for being spontaneous, not so much.
droid2drummer
Silver Member
This is true...Megapixels are also like watching a larger than 32in tv..if you don't up to 1080 You WILL see the pixelization.....If your 32 or smaller..720 will not make a diff...its all a ratio...But I can agree, if your not going to print the pics to a larger size, its useless...And as already stated , zooming to see detail will require a higher pixel to allow cleaner less pixelization....And I myself would like the option of a higher mp as I was a photographer and I take many pics and send them to family, and when it hits there computer or they want it blown up, I don't want them to see pixels...lol and...to carry around a camera and a phone, kindof defeats the purpose of them even upgrading the technology into these devices...lol..But, its what each person wants....Honestly between the 5 and eight..Not too too much diff....once you hit the 12 and 14 then oh yes..biiiiiiiig difference....peace!
Edit..yes I misspelled and used there instead of their and it bothered me enough to edit...Lol
You juss been TAPPED! by the drummer
LIQUID 3.0 or Anything but Stock!!!!
-------------------PEACE---------------------
Yes of course. For the small minority that want to view cell phone pictures on gigantic monitors, it will matter. I think it's silly. Cell phone cameras are not at the point where they can make quality poster-size prints, despite what the MPs tell you. Viewing it full size will look grainy no matter how big the file is. That's just something for the pixel-counters to obsess over. For that, you still need a real camera. When I want a 20x30 print for my wall, I'll go to my DSLR
From 8+ feet away you can't notice a difference between 1080 and 720. Also, the lense has more to do with picture quality, even blown up, as MPs. My 14MP Cannon point and shoot can't come close to touching my 6MP Nikon DSLR.
For the last time: Can we stop saying "more MP = better camera"? Please!
For the last time: Can we stop saying "more MP = better camera"? Please!
When I want a 20x30 print for my wall, I'll go to my DSLR
I want that picture.
That was pure luck
Took that in Maui at a public aquarium. Ended up getting published in National Geographic, July '11 issue. Paid for my vacation!Green Sea Turtle: As seen in National Geographic - Visions of Earth: July 2011 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
That was pure luck
Green Sea Turtle: As seen in National Geographic - Visions of Earth: July 2011 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Wow! Do you sell your prints? (I was completely serious in saying I wanted it..)
