So since gsdreams was saying that this method is the reason why they aren't charging customers the method is meaningless. They are currently not charing customers because according to you, they can't.
What we are saying here is that they are going the least costly route to prevent tethering which is to take away some of the tethering apps on the market and eventually pushing out updates to all phones that will break some of the tethering apps and pop up a paywall. This is a good cheap way to stop a bunch of tethering without offending a customer and automatically posting a tethering charge on people's accounts or accusing them of stealing. They don't want to lose you as a customer, they just want you to stop tethering or pay for it.
And exactly how are they going to push updates to those who have root and use a custom rom? What about the Droid1 last I heard there is no more support for that device. Didn't Motorola stop with gingerbread?
Sent from my Droid
Motorola isn't even releasing Gingerbread for the Droid 1 as far as anything I have heard.
And it won't stop those with a custom rom who don't get stock updates, but if it keeps up they could lock the OS on future phones so you can't root it or edit it.
Each step Verizon takes isn't expected to be an immediate fix. Let's see, remove tethering apps from Marketplace probably cost them less than $200 to implement. It probably will stop anywhere from 5% to 10% of those that are using it. Out of that 5% to 10% if 10 of them switch to hotspot verizon just made there money back in one month.
Throttling of customers in the top 5%, if that lowers verizon's bandwidth cost in a large city by 1% it paid for the cost to implement plus some.
You have to see this from a Business Perspective, not an end user perspective.