But if altered code is released as open source, how does the chain not continue? Is open source not really "open"?
It sounds like you are basing your point of view off whether or not any laws or copyrights were broken.
But if altered code is released as open source, how does the chain not continue? Is open source not really "open"?
OK. I have come to a final conclusion. (BASF)
YouTube - BASF Sandboard, Dress and Motorcycle
I don't make the ROM "they" use. I make the ROM better.
(still the man BD)
Go ahead....flame me i don't care
I just had to repost this from another thread in the ROM section. This is simply unbelievable.
A user posed a question in the the Koush sub-forum about switching from Ultimate Droid to CyanogenMod. The user asked if he needed to do a data and cache wipe during the install. Koush responded:
"Originally Posted by koush
You may need to just bite the bullet and do a fresh install, without your app backups. The "base" of UD and CyanogenMod are so different, that I would highly recommend this, as things may go really wrong otherwise."
Didn't Koush recently flame the every living heck out of blackdroid, along with Cynanogen, because they were claiming Ultimate Droid nothing more than CyanogenMOD that had been skinned?
:icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek:
I just had to repost this from another thread in the ROM section. This is simply unbelievable.
A user posed a question in the the Koush sub-forum about switching from Ultimate Droid to CyanogenMod. The user asked if he needed to do a data and cache wipe during the install. Koush responded:
"Originally Posted by koush
You may need to just bite the bullet and do a fresh install, without your app backups. The "base" of UD and CyanogenMod are so different, that I would highly recommend this, as things may go really wrong otherwise."
Didn't Koush recently flame the every living heck out of blackdroid, along with Cynanogen, because they were claiming Ultimate Droid nothing more than CyanogenMOD that had been skinned?
:icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek:
But if altered code is released as open source, how does the chain not continue? Is open source not really "open"?
It sounds like you are basing your point of view off whether or not any laws or copyrights were broken.
But if altered code is released as open source, how does the chain not continue? Is open source not really "open"?
It sounds like you are basing your point of view off whether or not any laws or copyrights were broken.
You didn't answer my question.
I've had code stolen before not particularly in the android scene (people i work around are great!). Your opinion is your opinion i'm just trying to understand how someone considers stealing someone elses work is okay? That's all.
If you notice, the ones that have no problem stealing code are all BD's fans. He has quite the power of convincing people, including his "developers," that he did not steal and he made it all himself.
Its not worth fighting with them, soon BD will be gone and they shall follow to ruin another forum.
ohh nooo BD's in my brain...g.g....r.r.a..r..
BD didnt' steal anything...it was an accident, I, i mean he, left an stupid .xml file....too many windows opened on my screen......cut copy....no no...build...spreadsheet does not exist...I built it all...
Someone has plans to build a doghouse. Someone has the same plans to build the same doghouse. The "plans" come from "open source" so anyone can use them. One person builds it plain and another adds heat/air conditioning. But both start from the same plan? (google source code)
What is the difference?
Taking someone else's idea (or work) is what is done every minute of the day in the world. Thats how development works and gets better.
stop avoiding the question, why no direct contact from koush or cyanogen???
my statement will explain why it took so long, it will not be liles. you dont like us you dont like us, you do like us then thats cool people understand mistakes happen. not everything is easy to figure out how a mistake this big could happen.
If you notice, the ones that have no problem stealing code are all BD's fans. He has quite the power of convincing people, including his "developers," that he did not steal and he made it all himself.
Its not worth fighting with them, soon BD will be gone and they shall follow to ruin another forum.
ohh nooo BD's in my brain...g.g....r.r.a..r..
BD didnt' steal anything...it was an accident, I, i mean he, left an stupid .xml file....too many windows opened on my screen......cut copy....no no...build...spreadsheet does not exist...I built it all...
Someone has plans to build a doghouse. Someone has the same plans to build the same doghouse. The "plans" come from "open source" so anyone can use them. One person builds it plain and another adds heat/air conditioning. But both start from the same plan? (google source code)
What is the difference?
Taking someone else's idea (or work) is what is done every minute of the day in the world. Thats how development works and gets better.
I'm glad I don't do business with this guy.
It sounds like you are basing your point of view off whether or not any laws or copyrights were broken.
You didn't answer my question.
There is no "coypright" in this situation. That is why its so hard to understand and the choices that have been handed down are liked by some but disliked by many more.
Somebody should run a poll:
Should Blackdroid stay:
Should Blackdroid go:
I am not going to do it but it would be interesting numbers. (not to mention the decision has been made and won't change)