I've been reading this thread and I get the feeling that some people just don't get it. They seem to think that tethering is a right.
Well, I hate to break it to you. It's NOT a right... It's a luxury. And you have to pay for it. I can think in the back of my mind that it's a rip off, but ultimately they provide the access and I have to abide by the terms. One of which is that if you want to use your phone as an access point you have to pay. Period. Sorry but the cover charge doesn't include the drinks. That's life, and it's their prerogative.
I blow through 3-5GBs per month and once or twice a year I peak at 6 and I pay for every bit of it because it's not a necessity it's a LUXURY. There are other methods I could use to connect my laptop, tablet or isolated computer when I'm away from my home or office. But they are all more difficult and less reliable, so I pay for the LUXURY of having them attain access to the internet easily. That's just the way it is until another wireless company provides it in a cheaper/similar fashion. Until then I PAY. You can skirt their system but you know the rules, and if they catch you don't cry. Be a big boy and take your lumps because you knew the deal.
It's a LUXURY that you have to pay for.
But in the end with all that's happening with the Android system I'm really giving an honest look at other providers and platforms. Tethering is only a small portion of this whole thing. This is really about controlling the life cycle of their devices. They want to make it so that phone hardware can't be accelerated to be comparable to upcoming devices and they can entice users with updated operating systems on new phones. They don't want you to keep that two year old handset running the latest software. They want you to trade it in for a new phone, new software, and of course, a brand new contract with updated terms.