I'm really torn between these two phones. I have a GN right now (can return before 15th), but the data signal on this phone has been rather spotty and volumes for both the external speaker and calls are too low for me (I've tried Volume+). I do like its display and the fact it will probably get the next Android OS when it comes out. GN is a nice device, but I'm afraid I might end up being stuck with a phone that has problems in what I consider to be the most important function (making call) for the next two years.
A few of questions I have for the Razr users who also know what GN is like are:
1. Is Razr noticeably louder than GN?
2. Does it really hold its signal better?
3. I've actually never had an android before GN, so I don't even really know well what Gingerbread is like (other than playing with my friends' phones for a few seconds at a time). Is it a big stepdown from ICS?
Other than that, the non-removable back on Razr is probably my biggest concern. I know you can still remove it, but doesn't it void warranty?
I do really like the design of Razr and if it is a noticeably better phone in terms of holding signal and call quality/volume, I think I would go exchange my GN for it.
Will try to answer as best I can:
1. Will hopefully know tomorrow, G Nex is coming be Fedex. I do know my RAZR sounds louder than my Droid X1. When I got the RAZR I finally retired my Droid 1 as an alarm clock, I just found the battery for it yesterday.
2. See 1...lol. I live n work in a bad reception area, apt is a virtual dead zone. So I should be able to see reception issues easier.
3. From what I saw on the Droid 1....as far as looks... it looks like a huge step up. This might be the first version of stock Android on phones I dont consider too plain, boring. The RAZR has Gingerbread + Moto Application Platform (the skin, custom UI formerly known as Blur)
Dont really know if removing the back on the RAZR voids the warranty. I did do it, its not that hard. Didnt remove the battery tho. However:
1.) there is no spare, extended batteries for it....yet...maybe
2.) The reset works so far, havent seen too many complaints about it not working.
3.) There are very small external batteries that carry alot more battery life than any extended or spare. I will be using one for all my phones from now on.
Some folks doing battery life and reception tests on another site gave the edge to the RAZR. One even pit Smart Actions on the RAZR against Juice Defender on the G Nex. (Juice Defender is an app that can be installed on any phone, Smart Actions is only on the RAZR...although it is similar to apps like Locale, Tasker) As always like with any phone, the G Nex coulda been a dud, battery coulda been a dud....
A site called Anandtech, a very good site for go to info about tech in general IMO, has a Bench tool that compares all kinds of different tech. On that tool, the G Nex has very low talk time battery life vs. other LTE phones on Verizon. So according to that Bench tool, overall the RAZR had better battery life, with talk times being the biggest difference.
G Nex does have the advantage of extended batteries, spare batteries.